» Articles » PMID: 2282112

Effect of a General Practitioner's Consulting Style on Patients' Satisfaction: a Controlled Study

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1990 Oct 27
PMID 2282112
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of directing and sharing styles of consultation by a general practitioner on patients' satisfaction with the consultation.

Design: Patients were randomised to receive a directing or sharing style in the part of the consultation concerned with giving treatment, advice, and prognosis.

Setting: An inner London general practice.

Patients: 359 Randomly selected patients consulting with one general practitioner. Four patients refused to participate and five were excluded. Thirty failed to complete the initial assessment and 110 failed to complete the assessment a week later, giving response rates of 89% and 58% respectively.

Main Outcome Measures: Patients' satisfaction with the general practitioner's perceived understanding of their problem and the explanation they received and whether they felt that they had been helped immediately after the consultation and one week later.

Results: Patients who had the directing style of consultation reported significantly higher levels of satisfaction on almost all the outcome measures. This was particularly striking for patients with physical problems (excellent explanation 23/68 (34%) v 10/65 (15%), p less than 0.02; excellent understanding 25/68 (37%) v 9/66 (14%), p = 0.004), and for patients who received a prescription (excellent explanation 20/60 (33%) v 9/59 (15%), p less than 0.04; excellent understanding 27/60 (45%) v 10/59 (17%), p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in the responses to the directing and sharing styles in longer consultations (8/31 (26%) v 8/31 (26%)), in which the main treatment was advice (10/30 (33%) v 7/36 (19%)), and among patients with psychological (6/17 (35%) v 6/27 (22%)) or chronic problems (14/28 (50%) v 8/32 (25%)).

Conclusions: Style of consultation does influence the satisfaction of the patient, but its effect is most noticeable in consultations with patients with physical problems and patients who receive a prescription.

Citing Articles

Patient-centredness in primary care walk-in clinics for refugees in Hamburg.

Hill J, Kruger K, Boczor S, Kloppe T, von dem Knesebeck O, Scherer M BMC Prim Care. 2023; 24(1):112.

PMID: 37149641 PMC: 10163696. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02060-2.


Redefining Clinical Skills in History Taking in Association With Epidemiological Assessment of Risk Factors, and Diagnosis of Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases With a Special Emphasis on COVID-19.

Narasimman A, Choudhari S Cureus. 2022; 14(10):e30829.

PMID: 36457644 PMC: 9705066. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30829.


Exploring drivers of patient satisfaction using a random forest algorithm.

Simsekler M, Alhashmi N, Azar E, King N, Luqman R, Al Mulla A BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021; 21(1):157.

PMID: 33985481 PMC: 8120836. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01519-5.


What can clinicians do to improve outcomes across psychiatric treatments: a conceptual review of non-specific components.

Priebe S, Conneely M, McCabe R, Bird V Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019; 29:e48.

PMID: 31412975 PMC: 8061300. DOI: 10.1017/S2045796019000428.


The effect of different sampling and recall periods in the CAHPS Clinician & Group (CG-CAHPS) survey.

Hargraves J, Cosenza C, Elliott M, Cleary P Health Serv Res. 2019; 54(5):1036-1044.

PMID: 31132159 PMC: 6736918. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13173.


References
1.
Thomas K . The consultation and the therapeutic illusion. Br Med J. 1978; 1(6123):1327-8. PMC: 1604657. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.6123.1327. View

2.
INGELFINGER F . Arrogance. N Engl J Med. 1980; 303(26):1507-11. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198012253032604. View