» Articles » PMID: 22817843

Risk Factors for Contacts Between Wild Boar and Outdoor Pigs in Switzerland and Investigations on Potential Brucella Suis Spill-over

Overview
Journal BMC Vet Res
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2012 Jul 24
PMID 22817843
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Due to the parallel increase of the number of free-ranging wild boar and domestic pigs reared outdoor, the risk that they interact has become higher. Contacts with wild boar can be the origin of disease outbreaks in pigs, as it has been documented for brucellosis in some European countries. This study aimed at quantifying the occurrence of contacts between wild boar and outdoor domestic pigs in Switzerland, and identifying risk factors for these contacts. Furthermore, exposed pigs were tested for pathogen spill-over, taking Brucella suis as an example because B. suis is widespread in Swiss wild boar while domestic pigs are officially free of brucellosis.

Results: Thirty-one percent of the game-wardens and 25% of the pig owners participating to a country-wide questionnaire survey reported contacts, including approaches of wild boar outside the fence, intrusions, and mating. Seventeen piggeries (5%) reported the birth of cross-bred animals. Risk factors for contacts identified by a uni- and multivariable logistic regression approach were: distance between pig enclosure and buildings, proximity of a forest, electric fences, and fences ≤ 60 cm. Pigs of the Mangalitza breed were most at risk for mating with wild boar (births of cross-bred animals). Blood and tissues of 218 outdoor pigs from 13 piggeries were tested for an infection with Brucella suis, using rose bengal test, complement fixation test, and an IS711-based real-time PCR. One piggery with previous wild boar contacts was found infected with B. suis, however, epidemiological investigations failed to identify the direct source of infection.

Conclusions: Results show that interactions between wild boar and outdoor pigs are not uncommon, pointing at the existing risk of pathogen spill-over. Provided data on risk factors for these interactions could help the risk-based implementation of protection measures for piggeries. The documentation of a brucellosis outbreak in pigs despite the freedom-of-disease status underlines the importance of improving pathogen surveillance strategies and increasing disease awareness of farmers and veterinary practitioners.

Citing Articles

Hepatitis E and Potential Public Health Implications from a One-Health Perspective: Special Focus on the European Wild Boar ().

Castagna F, Liguori G, Lombardi R, Bava R, Costagliola A, Giordano A Pathogens. 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 39452712 PMC: 11510200. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13100840.


Assessment of domestic pig-bushpig (Potamochoerus larvatus) interactions through local knowledge in rural areas of Madagascar.

Rakotoarivony R, Kassie D, Andriamahefa A, Andria-Mananjara D, Rakotoarinoro M, Ramaroson H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16310.

PMID: 39009628 PMC: 11250805. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67208-1.


Analysis of a European general wildlife health surveillance program: Chances, challenges and recommendations.

Heiderich E, Keller S, Pewsner M, Origgi F, Zurcher-Giovannini S, Borel S PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0301438.

PMID: 38771857 PMC: 11108157. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301438.


A combined methodological approach to characterize pig farming and its influence on the occurrence of interactions between wild boars and domestic pigs in Corsican micro-regions.

Dupon L, Trabucco B, Munoz F, Casabianca F, Charrier F, Laval M Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1253060.

PMID: 38628940 PMC: 11019438. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1253060.


Hunting for Answers: Assessing spp. Seroprevalence and Risks in Red Deer and Wild Boar in Central Portugal.

Pires H, Cardoso L, Lopes A, Fontes M, Santos-Silva S, Matos M Pathogens. 2024; 13(3).

PMID: 38535585 PMC: 10975371. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13030242.


References
1.
Kuhnert P, Overesch G, Belloy L . Genotyping of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in wild boar lung samples. Vet Microbiol. 2011; 152(1-2):191-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.04.026. View

2.
Hinic V, Brodard I, Thomann A, Holub M, Miserez R, Abril C . IS711-based real-time PCR assay as a tool for detection of Brucella spp. in wild boars and comparison with bacterial isolation and serology. BMC Vet Res. 2009; 5:22. PMC: 2719624. DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-5-22. View

3.
Cousins D . Mycobacterium bovis infection and control in domestic livestock. Rev Sci Tech. 2001; 20(1):71-85. DOI: 10.20506/rst.20.1.1263. View

4.
Zimmermann W, Neff F, Birrer S . [Serological survey of Sarcoptes scabies var. suis infection using colostrum samples: preliminary results]. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2001; 143(2):70-5. View

5.
Romero C, Meade P, Shultz J, Chung H, Gibbs E, Hahn E . Venereal transmission of pseudorabies viruses indigenous to feral swine. J Wildl Dis. 2001; 37(2):289-96. DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-37.2.289. View