» Articles » PMID: 22815642

Comparison of Bromfenac 0.09% QD to Nepafenac 0.1% TID After Cataract Surgery: Pilot Evaluation of Visual Acuity, Macular Volume, and Retinal Thickness at a Single Site

Overview
Journal Clin Ophthalmol
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2012 Jul 21
PMID 22815642
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.09% once daily (QD) and nepafenac 0.1% ophthalmic suspension three times daily following cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation, specifically looking at any differences in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuities, macular volume, and/or retinal thickness changes.

Methods: Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either bromfenac (n = 10) QD or nepafenac (n = 10) three times daily. Dosing began 3 days before cataract surgery, continuing to day 21 postsurgery. In addition to the investigated nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug regimen, all subjects received antiinfective intraoperative and postoperative standard of care. Subjects were followed at 1 day and 1, 3, and 6 weeks postoperatively. Study visit assessments included best-corrected visual acuity, biomicroscopy, summed ocular inflammation score (anterior chamber cells and flare grading), intraocular pressure measurement, adverse event recording, and concomitant medication review. Optical coherence tomography was performed at 1, 3, and 6 weeks.

Results: Both treatment groups had similar baseline measurements. Outcomes for mean letters read (P = 0.318), mean change in macular volume (P = 0.665), and retinal thickness (P = 0.552) were not statistically different between the groups from baseline through week six, although independently only the bromfenac group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in letters gained from baseline to week six (P = 0.040). In the same time period, mean macular volume and retinal thickening worsened in the nepafenac group, demonstrating a statistically significant increase (P = 0.006) at week six for macular volume when compared to baseline. One subject in the nepafenac group experienced recurrent inflammation at week six, was unmasked, and then rescued with bromfenac 0.09% QD and difluprednate 0.05% QD.

Conclusion: Both bromfenac and nepafenac resulted in positive clinical outcomes of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuities. Postoperative measurements of macular volume and retinal thickness of bromfenac subjects showed a trend toward improved vision, less retinal thickening, and more stable macular volumes overall.

Citing Articles

Topical NSAIDs impact on macular oedema and visual outcome after phacoemulsification: systematic review of RCTs with network meta-analysis.

Almasri M, Ismaiel A, Gavris I, Leucuta D, Gavris M, Nicoara S Eye (Lond). 2024; 38(17):3222-3230.

PMID: 39095467 PMC: 11584663. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03268-x.


Optimization of hyaluronan-enriched cubosomes for bromfenac delivery enhancing corneal permeation: characterization, ex vivo, and in vivo evaluation.

Shoman N, Gebreel R, El-Nabarawi M, Attia A Drug Deliv. 2023; 30(1):2162162.

PMID: 36587627 PMC: 9943252. DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2022.2162162.


Effect of nepafenac 0.1% on retinal thickness after cataract surgery in patients without risk factors for cystoid macular edema.

Sahin A, Kukner A, Ulas F, Dogan U Int J Ophthalmol. 2020; 13(12):1901-1907.

PMID: 33344188 PMC: 7708356. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2020.12.09.


Efficacy and safety of bromfenac 0.09% and sodium hyaluronate 0.4% combination therapy, versus placebo in patients with pterygium I-III for clinical signs on ocular inflammation.

Chavez-Mondragon E, Palacio C, Soto-Gomez A, Villanueva-Najera M, De Wit-Carter G, Suarez-Velasco R Clin Ophthalmol. 2019; 13:781-787.

PMID: 31118556 PMC: 6507105. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S203648.


Comparison of Once-Daily Bromfenac 0.07% Versus Once-Daily Nepafenac 0.3% in Patients Undergoing Phacoemulsification.

Toyos M Ophthalmol Ther. 2019; 8(2):261-270.

PMID: 30868419 PMC: 6513915. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-019-0174-x.


References
1.
Perente I, Utine C, Ozturker C, Cakir M, Kaya V, Eren H . Evaluation of macular changes after uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery by optical coherence tomography. Curr Eye Res. 2007; 32(3):241-7. DOI: 10.1080/02713680601160610. View

2.
Wolf E, Braunstein A, Shih C, Braunstein R . Incidence of visually significant pseudophakic macular edema after uneventful phacoemulsification in patients treated with nepafenac. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33(9):1546-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.018. View

3.
Miyake K, Masuda K, Shirato S, Oshika T, Eguchi K, Hoshi H . Comparison of diclofenac and fluorometholone in preventing cystoid macular edema after small incision cataract surgery: a multicentered prospective trial. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2000; 44(1):58-67. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-5155(99)00176-8. View

4.
McColgin A, Heier J . Control of intraocular inflammation associated with cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000; 11(1):3-6. DOI: 10.1097/00055735-200002000-00002. View

5.
Flach A . Topical nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in ophthalmology. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2002; 42(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1097/00004397-200201000-00003. View