» Articles » PMID: 22815407

Division of Labor in Frontal Eye Field Neurons During Presaccadic Remapping of Visual Receptive Fields

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2012 Jul 21
PMID 22815407
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our percept of visual stability across saccadic eye movements may be mediated by presaccadic remapping. Just before a saccade, neurons that remap become visually responsive at a future field (FF), which anticipates the saccade vector. Hence, the neurons use corollary discharge of saccades. Many of the neurons also decrease their response at the receptive field (RF). Presaccadic remapping occurs in several brain areas including the frontal eye field (FEF), which receives corollary discharge of saccades in its layer IV from a collicular-thalamic pathway. We studied, at two levels, the microcircuitry of remapping in the FEF. At the laminar level, we compared remapping between layers IV and V. At the cellular level, we compared remapping between different neuron types of layer IV. In the FEF in four monkeys (Macaca mulatta), we identified 27 layer IV neurons with orthodromic stimulation and 57 layer V neurons with antidromic stimulation from the superior colliculus. With the use of established criteria, we classified the layer IV neurons as putative excitatory (n = 11), putative inhibitory (n = 12), or ambiguous (n = 4). We found that just before a saccade, putative excitatory neurons increased their visual response at the RF, putative inhibitory neurons showed no change, and ambiguous neurons increased their visual response at the FF. None of the neurons showed presaccadic visual changes at both RF and FF. In contrast, neurons in layer V showed full remapping (at both the RF and FF). Our data suggest that elemental signals for remapping are distributed across neuron types in early cortical processing and combined in later stages of cortical microcircuitry.

Citing Articles

Sensory tuning in neuronal movement commands.

Baumann M, Bogadhi A, Denninger A, Hafed Z Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(38):e2305759120.

PMID: 37695898 PMC: 10515157. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2305759120.


Inhibitory tagging in the superior colliculus during visual search.

Conroy C, Nanjappa R, McPeek R J Neurophysiol. 2023; 130(4):824-837.

PMID: 37671440 PMC: 10637734. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00095.2023.


Peri-Saccadic Orientation Identification Performance and Visual Neural Sensitivity Are Higher in the Upper Visual Field.

Fracasso A, Buonocore A, Hafed Z J Neurosci. 2023; 43(41):6884-6897.

PMID: 37640553 PMC: 10573757. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1740-22.2023.


Superior colliculus saccade motor bursts do not dictate movement kinematics.

Zhang T, Malevich T, Baumann M, Hafed Z Commun Biol. 2022; 5(1):1222.

PMID: 36369354 PMC: 9652463. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-04203-0.


Transsaccadic visual perception of foveal compared to peripheral environmental changes.

Bansal S, Joiner W J Vis. 2021; 21(6):12.

PMID: 34160578 PMC: 8237106. DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.6.12.


References
1.
Frank L, Brown E, Wilson M . A comparison of the firing properties of putative excitatory and inhibitory neurons from CA1 and the entorhinal cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2001; 86(4):2029-40. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.4.2029. View

2.
Bruno R, Simons D . Feedforward mechanisms of excitatory and inhibitory cortical receptive fields. J Neurosci. 2002; 22(24):10966-75. PMC: 6758449. View

3.
Douglas R, Martin K . Neuronal circuits of the neocortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004; 27:419-51. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144152. View

4.
Kawaguchi Y . Groupings of nonpyramidal and pyramidal cells with specific physiological and morphological characteristics in rat frontal cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1993; 69(2):416-31. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1993.69.2.416. View

5.
Merriam E, Colby C . Active vision in parietal and extrastriate cortex. Neuroscientist. 2005; 11(5):484-93. DOI: 10.1177/1073858405276871. View