» Articles » PMID: 22815127

Bearing the Brunt: Co-workers' Experiences of Work Reintegration Processes

Overview
Journal J Occup Rehabil
Publisher Springer
Date 2012 Jul 21
PMID 22815127
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Work disability research has found co-worker support to be a significant but under-recognised aspect of work reintegration (WR) processes. Although co-workers work alongside returning workers, their practical contribution to WR success or failure is often invisible to others. This study aimed to gain further insight into the role and contribution of co-workers in WR interventions.

Method: An exploratory qualitative pilot study was conducted in Toronto, Canada in 2011. Three focus groups were conducted with 13 co-workers, recruited for their direct experience of 'working alongside' a returning worker. An iterative data gathering and analysis process occurred. Themes were generated from categories in open-ended interview questions and new issues arising from the data.

Findings: The findings detail co-workers' practical experiences of WR processes and their reflections on social and work conditions that impacted their participation. Co-workers' capacity to support returning workers was related to the quality of the WR arrangements, the relationship with the returning worker, work culture, and the duration of the required support. Workplace privacy and confidentiality requirements were identified as a key challenge for co-worker participation. The effects on co-workers of WR processes ranged from the opportunity to learn new skills to disillusionment and withdrawal from the workplace. In worst case scenarios, 'ripple effects' including emotional distress, physical injury and termination of co-workers' employment had occurred.

Conclusion: Co-workers are not a neutral party in WR procedures. Formalizing the co-worker role to include communication, consideration and recognition might improve co-workers' WR experiences.

Citing Articles

Perspectives and Experiences of Public Safety Personnel Engaged in a Peer-Led Workplace Reintegration Program Post Critical Incident or Operational Stress Injury: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis.

Jones C, Spencer S, OGreysik E, Smith-MacDonald L, Bright K, Beck A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(7).

PMID: 39063525 PMC: 11277017. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21070949.


Return-to-Work Experiences in Ontario Policing: Injured But Not Broken.

Van Eerd D, Le Pouesard M, Yanar B, Irvin E, Gignac M, Jetha A J Occup Rehabil. 2023; 34(1):265-277.

PMID: 37735312 PMC: 10899295. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-023-10135-1.


Return-to-Work After Work-Related Injury in the Construction Sector: A Scoping Review.

Sharpe K, Afshar T, St-Hilaire F, McLeod C J Occup Rehabil. 2022; 32(4):664-684.

PMID: 35178661 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-022-10028-9.


Managing and Mitigating Suffering in the Return-to-Work Process.

Woods M, Matthewson M Front Psychol. 2021; 12:805855.

PMID: 34956027 PMC: 8695797. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.805855.


Early vocational rehabilitation for people with spinal cord injury: a research protocol using realist synthesis and interviews to understand how and why it works.

Dunn J, Martin R, Hackney J, Nunnerley J, Snell D, Bourke J BMJ Open. 2021; 11(5):e048753.

PMID: 33941637 PMC: 8098913. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048753.


References
1.
Charmaz K . Premises, principles, and practices in qualitative research: revisiting the foundations. Qual Health Res. 2004; 14(7):976-93. DOI: 10.1177/1049732304266795. View

2.
Schultz I, Crook J, Meloche G, BERKOWITZ J, Milner R, Zuberbier O . Psychosocial factors predictive of occupational low back disability: towards development of a return-to-work model. Pain. 2004; 107(1-2):77-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.09.019. View

3.
Burton A, Kendall N, Pearce B, Birrell L, Bainbridge L . Management of work-relevant upper limb disorders: a review. Occup Med (Lond). 2008; 59(1):44-52. DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqn151. View

4.
Crook J, Milner R, Schultz I, Stringer B . Determinants of occupational disability following a low back injury: a critical review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2002; 12(4):277-95. DOI: 10.1023/a:1020278708861. View

5.
Rusch F, Minch K . Identification of co-worker involvement in supported employment: a review and analysis. Res Dev Disabil. 1988; 9(3):247-54. DOI: 10.1016/0891-4222(88)90003-0. View