» Articles » PMID: 22814623

A Ventricular Assist Device As a Bridge to Recovery, Decision Making, or Transplantation in Patients with Advanced Cardiac Failure

Overview
Journal Surg Today
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2012 Jul 21
PMID 22814623
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite many advances in the management of patients with heart failure, acute cardiogenic shock and progressive congestive heart failure remain serious problems with dismal prognoses. Both temporary and permanent mechanical support has been gaining wide clinical application in this patient population. Although mechanical circulatory support technology is rapidly evolving, this approach is associated with multiple issues such as the optimal duration of temporary support, ideal timing to bridge these patients to a long-term device, and selection of the right device for the right patient. The currently available devices are categorized into two major groups: temporary and long-term devices (including destination therapy). Heart failure is a dynamic condition, and the therapeutic approach may need to be modified depending on the patient's condition. Furthermore, the patient's preexisting morbidity, age, socioeconomic status, and family support are confounding factors that need to be considered when making such decisions. Clinical trials including prospective studies, as well as meticulous analysis of existing data, may help develop universal guidelines to select the right device. This manuscript will review the most widely used ventricular assist devices.

Citing Articles

Early thrombus formation in patient with HeartWare left ventricular assist device presenting with acute heart failure.

Ucar M, Karakas M, Bayrak M, Altekin R, Koksel U, Bayezid O J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2016; 28(1):49-51.

PMID: 26778905 PMC: 4685237. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsha.2015.06.003.


Current status of third-generation implantable left ventricular assist devices in Japan, Duraheart and HeartWare.

Sawa Y Surg Today. 2014; 45(6):672-81.

PMID: 25139211 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-014-0957-6.

References
1.
Reverdin S, Gregoric I, Kar B, Loyalka P, Bieniarz M, LeMaire S . Bridge to transplantation with the TandemHeart: bending the indications in a chronic aortic dissection patient with postcardiotomy shock. Tex Heart Inst J. 2008; 35(3):340-1. PMC: 2565541. View

2.
Chen J, Weinberg A, Rose E, Thompson S, Mancini D, Ellison J . Multivariate analysis of factors affecting waiting time to heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996; 61(2):570-5. DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)01031-9. View

3.
Taylor D, Edwards L, Aurora P, Christie J, Dobbels F, Kirk R . Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-fifth official adult heart transplant report--2008. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008; 27(9):943-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2008.06.017. View

4.
Raess D, Weber D . Impella 2.5. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2010; 2(2):168-72. DOI: 10.1007/s12265-009-9099-4. View

5.
Taylor D, Edwards L, Boucek M, Trulock E, Waltz D, Keck B . Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-third official adult heart transplantation report--2006. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006; 25(8):869-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2006.05.002. View