» Articles » PMID: 22810273

Robust Inference in Discrete Hazard Models for Randomized Clinical Trials

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2012 Jul 20
PMID 22810273
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Time-to-event data in which failures are only assessed at discrete time points are common in many clinical trials. Examples include oncology studies where events are observed through periodic screenings such as radiographic scans. When the survival endpoint is acknowledged to be discrete, common methods for the analysis of observed failure times include the discrete hazard models (e.g., the discrete-time proportional hazards and the continuation ratio model) and the proportional odds model. In this manuscript, we consider estimation of a marginal treatment effect in discrete hazard models where the constant treatment effect assumption is violated. We demonstrate that the estimator resulting from these discrete hazard models is consistent for a parameter that depends on the underlying censoring distribution. An estimator that removes the dependence on the censoring mechanism is proposed and its asymptotic distribution is derived. Basing inference on the proposed estimator allows for statistical inference that is scientifically meaningful and reproducible. Simulation is used to assess the performance of the presented methodology in finite samples.

Citing Articles

Causal interpretation of the hazard ratio in randomized clinical trials.

Fay M, Li F Clin Trials. 2024; 21(5):623-635.

PMID: 38679930 PMC: 11502288. DOI: 10.1177/17407745241243308.


Statistical Issues and Recommendations for Clinical Trials Conducted During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Meyer R, Ratitch B, Wolbers M, Marchenko O, Quan H, Li D Stat Biopharm Res. 2021; 12(4):399-411.

PMID: 34191971 PMC: 8011486. DOI: 10.1080/19466315.2020.1779122.


Censoring-robust estimation in observational survival studies: Assessing the relative effectiveness of vascular access type on patency among end-stage renal disease patients.

Nguyen V, Gillen D Stat Biosci. 2020; 9(2):406-430.

PMID: 32190128 PMC: 7079760. DOI: 10.1007/s12561-016-9162-z.


Proportional exponentiated link transformed hazards (ELTH) models for discrete time survival data with application.

Joeng H, Chen M, Kang S Lifetime Data Anal. 2015; 22(1):38-62.

PMID: 25772374 PMC: 4676960. DOI: 10.1007/s10985-015-9326-z.

References
1.
Bennett S . Analysis of survival data by the proportional odds model. Stat Med. 1983; 2(2):273-7. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780020223. View

2.
Breslow N . Covariance analysis of censored survival data. Biometrics. 1974; 30(1):89-99. View

3.
IRWIN J . The standard error of an estimate of expectation of life, with special reference to expectation of tumourless life in experiments with mice. J Hyg (Lond). 1949; 47(2):188. PMC: 2234920. DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400014443. View

4.
Xu R, OQuigley J . Estimating average regression effect under non-proportional hazards. Biostatistics. 2003; 1(4):423-39. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/1.4.423. View

5.
Berridge D, Whitehead J . Analysis of failure time data with ordinal categories of response. Stat Med. 1991; 10(11):1703-10. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780101108. View