» Articles » PMID: 22808148

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Tenofovir and Prophylactic Efficacy Against HIV-1 Infection

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Jul 19
PMID 22808148
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Antiviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) through daily drug administration can protect healthy individuals from HIV-1 infection. While PrEP was recently approved by the FDA, the potential long-term consequences of PrEP implementation remain entirely unclear. The aim of this study is to predict the efficacy of different prophylactic strategies with the pro-drug tenofovir-disoproxil-fumarate (TDF) and to assess the sensitivity towards timing- and mode of TDF administration (daily- vs. single dose), adherence and the number of transmitted viruses. We developed a pharmacokinetic model for TDF and its active anabolite tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP) and validated it with data from 4 different trials, including 4 distinct dosing regimes. Pharmacokinetics were coupled to an HIV model and viral decay following TDF mono-therapy was predicted, consistent with available data. Subsequently, a stochastic approach was used to estimate the % infections prevented by (i) daily TDF-based PrEP, (ii) one week TDF started either shortly before, or -after viral exposure and (iii) a single dose oral TDF before viral challenge (sd-PrEP). Analytical solutions were derived to assess the relation between intracellular TFV-DP concentrations and prophylactic efficacy. The predicted efficacy of TDF was limited by a slow accumulation of active compound (TFV-DP) and variable TFV-DP half-life and decreased with increasing numbers of transmitted viruses. Once daily TDF-based PrEP yielded [Formula: see text]80% protection, if at least 40% of pills were taken. Sd-PrEP with 300 mg or 600 mg TDF could prevent [Formula: see text]50% infections, when given at least before virus exposure. The efficacy dropped to [Formula: see text]10%, when given 1 h before 24 h exposure. Efficacy could not be increased with increasing dosage or prolonged administration. Post-exposure prophylaxis poorly prevented infection. The use of drugs that accumulate more rapidly, or local application of tenofovir gel may overcome the need for drug administration long before virus exposure.

Citing Articles

Modeling of HIV-1 prophylactic efficacy and toxicity with islatravir shows non-superiority for oral dosing, but promise as a subcutaneous implant.

Kim H, Zhang L, Hendrix C, Haberer J, von Kleist M CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024; 13(10):1693-1706.

PMID: 39164932 PMC: 11494919. DOI: 10.1002/psp4.13212.


The Application of Prodrugs as a Tool to Enhance the Properties of Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors.

Fernandes L, Lopes J, Bonjorno A, Prates J, Scarim C, Dos Santos J Viruses. 2023; 15(11).

PMID: 38005911 PMC: 10675571. DOI: 10.3390/v15112234.


Model-based predictions of protective HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis adherence levels in cisgender women.

Zhang L, Iannuzzi S, Chaturvedula A, Irungu E, Haberer J, Hendrix C Nat Med. 2023; 29(11):2753-2762.

PMID: 37957377 PMC: 10667095. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02615-x.


Clinical trial simulation to evaluate tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis dosing during pregnancy.

Scott R, Yu Y, Marzinke M, Coleman J, Hendrix C, Bies R Front Reprod Health. 2023; 5:1224580.

PMID: 37830105 PMC: 10565828. DOI: 10.3389/frph.2023.1224580.


Pharmacokinetic Model of Tenofovir and Emtricitabine and Their Intracellular Metabolites in Patients in the ANRS 134-COPHAR 3 Trial Using Dose Records.

Bertrand J, Barrail-Tran A, Fayette L, Savic R, Goujard C, Teicher E Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023; 67(5):e0233918.

PMID: 37098914 PMC: 10190280. DOI: 10.1128/aac.02339-18.


References
1.
Durand-Gasselin L, Da Silva D, Benech H, Pruvost A, Grassi J . Evidence and possible consequences of the phosphorylation of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in human red blood cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007; 51(6):2105-11. PMC: 1891370. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00831-06. View

2.
Patterson K, Prince H, Kraft E, Jenkins A, Shaheen N, Rooney J . Penetration of tenofovir and emtricitabine in mucosal tissues: implications for prevention of HIV-1 transmission. Sci Transl Med. 2011; 3(112):112re4. PMC: 3483088. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003174. View

3.
Morrow G, Vachot L, Vagenas P, Robbiani M . Current concepts of HIV transmission. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2008; 10(2):133-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11908-008-0024-9. View

4.
Bobardt M, Chatterji U, Selvarajah S, Van der Schueren B, David G, Kahn B . Cell-free human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transcytosis through primary genital epithelial cells. J Virol. 2006; 81(1):395-405. PMC: 1797244. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01303-06. View

5.
Shen L, Peterson S, Sedaghat A, McMahon M, Callender M, Zhang H . Dose-response curve slope sets class-specific limits on inhibitory potential of anti-HIV drugs. Nat Med. 2008; 14(7):762-6. PMC: 2743464. DOI: 10.1038/nm1777. View