» Articles » PMID: 22802989

Prevalence and Influence of Tibial Tunnel Widening After Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Patella-bone-tendon-bone-graft: Long-term Follow-up

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2012 Jul 18
PMID 22802989
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate incidence, degree and impact of tibial tunnel widening (TW) on patient-reported long-term clinical outcome, knee joint stability and prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) after isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. On average, 13.5 years after ACL reconstruction via patella-bone-tendon-bone autograft, 73 patients have been re-evaluated. Inclusion criteria consisted of an isolated anterior cruciate ligament rupture and reconstruction, a minimum of 10-year follow-up and no previous anterior cruciate ligament repair or associated intra-articular lesions. Clinical evaluation was performed via the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and the Tegner and Lysholm scores. Instrumental anterior laxity testing was carried out with the KT-1000™ arthrometer. The degree of degenerative changes and the prevalence of osteoarthritis were assessed with the Kellgren-Lawrence score. Tibial tunnel enlargement was radiographically evaluated on both antero-posterior and lateral views under establishment of 4 degrees of tibial tunnel widening by measuring the actual tunnel diameters in mm on the sclerotic margins of the inserted tunnels on 3 different points (T1-T3). Afterwards, a conversion of the absolute values in mm into a 4 staged ratio, based on the comparison to the results of the initial drill-width, should provide a better quantification and statistical analysis. Evaluation was performed postoperatively as well as on 2 year follow-up and 13 years after ACL reconstruction. Minimum follow-up was 10 years. 75% of patients were graded A or B according to IKDC score. The mean Lysholm score was 90.2±4.8 (25-100). Radiological assessment on long-term follow-up showed in 45% a grade I, in 24% a grade II, in 17% a grade III and in additional 12% a grade IV enlargement of the tibial tunnel. No evident progression of TW was found in comparison to the 2 year results. Radiological evaluation revealed degenerative changes in sense of a grade II OA in 54% of patients. Prevalence of a grade III or grade IV OA was found in 20%. Correlation analysis showed no significant relationship between the amount of tibial tunnel enlargement (P>0.05), long-term clinical results, anterior joint laxity or prevalence of osteoarthritis. Tunnel widening remains a radiological phenomenon which is most commonly observed within the short to midterm intervals after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and subsequently stabilises on mid and long- term follow-up. It does not adversely affect long-term clinical outcome and stability. Furthermore, tunnel widening doesn't constitute an increasing prevalence of osteoarthritis.

Citing Articles

Descriptive Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Tunnel Bone Grafting.

DeFroda S, Owens B, Wright R, Huston L, Pennings J, Haas A Am J Sports Med. 2022; 50(9):2397-2409.

PMID: 35833922 PMC: 10326863. DOI: 10.1177/03635465221104470.


Tibial tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective seven-year study evaluating the effects of initial graft tensioning and graft selection.

DeFroda S, Karamchedu N, Owens B, Bokshan S, Sullivan K, Fadale P Knee. 2018; 25(6):1107-1114.

PMID: 30414786 PMC: 6286238. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.08.003.


Tunnel osteolysis post-ACL reconstruction: a systematic review examining select diagnostic modalities, treatment options and rehabilitation protocols.

Bhullar R, Habib A, Zhang K, de Sa D, Horner N, Duong A Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 27(2):524-533.

PMID: 30242452 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5142-9.


Short-Term Contact Kinematic Changes and Longer-Term Biochemical Changes in the Cartilage After ACL Reconstruction: A Pilot Study.

Li G, Li J, Torriani M, Hosseini A Ann Biomed Eng. 2018; 46(11):1797-1805.

PMID: 29946971 PMC: 6204103. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-018-2079-6.


Ultrasound-Mediated Gene Delivery Enhances Tendon Allograft Integration in Mini-Pig Ligament Reconstruction.

Bez M, Kremen T, Tawackoli W, Avalos P, Sheyn D, Shapiro G Mol Ther. 2018; 26(7):1746-1755.

PMID: 29784586 PMC: 6035740. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.04.020.


References
1.
Webster K, Feller J, Hameister K . Bone tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts with 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001; 9(2):86-91. DOI: 10.1007/s001670100191. View

2.
Peyrache M, Djian P, Christel P, Witvoet J . Tibial tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1996; 4(1):2-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF01565989. View

3.
Mihelic R, Jurdana H, Jotanovic Z, Madjarevic T, Tudor A . Long-term results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison with non-operative treatment with a follow-up of 17-20 years. Int Orthop. 2011; 35(7):1093-7. PMC: 3167409. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1206-x. View

4.
Streich N, Zimmermann D, Bode G, Schmitt H . Reconstructive versus non-reconstructive treatment of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. A retrospective matched-pair long-term follow-up. Int Orthop. 2010; 35(4):607-13. PMC: 3066313. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1174-6. View

5.
Ma C, Francis K, Towers J, Irrgang J, Fu F, Harner C . Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation. Arthroscopy. 2004; 20(2):122-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.11.007. View