Biological Apatite (BAp) Crystallographic Orientation and Texture As a New Index for Assessing the Microstructure and Function of Bone Regenerated by Tissue Engineering
Overview
Affiliations
Recently, there have been remarkable advances in medical techniques for regenerating bone defects. To determine the degree of bone regeneration, it is essential to develop a new method that can analyze microstructure and related mechanical function. Here, quantitative analysis of the orientation distribution of biological apatite (BAp) crystallites by a microbeam X-ray diffractometer system is proposed as a new index of bone quality for the evaluation of regenerated bone microstructure. Preferential alignment of the BAp c-axis in the rabbit ulna and skull bone, regenerated by controlled release of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) was investigated. The BAp c-axis orientation was evaluated by the relative intensity between the (002) and (310) diffraction peaks, or the three-dimensional texture for the (002) peak. It was found that new bone in the defects was initially produced without preferential alignment of the BAp c-axis, and subsequently reproduced to recover towards the original alignment. In other words, the BAp density recovered prior to the BAp orientation. Perfect recovery of BAp alignment was not achieved in the ulna and skull defects after 4 weeks and 12 weeks, respectively. Apparent recovery of the macroscopic shape and bio-mineralization of BAp was almost complete in the ulna defect after 4 weeks. However, an additional 2 weeks was required for complete repair of BAp orientation. It is finally concluded that orientation distribution of BAp crystallites offers an effective means of evaluating the degree of microstructural regeneration, and also the related mechanical function, in regenerated hard tissues.
Kasahara M, Someya T, Kitamura K, Watanabe G, Matsunaga S, Abe S J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(3).
PMID: 38535249 PMC: 10971242. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15030056.
Evaluation of cortical bone strength using a quantitative ultrasound measurement device in dogs.
Sogawa T, Yamaguchi F, Misumi K, Fujiki M J Vet Med Sci. 2024; 86(3):325-332.
PMID: 38311401 PMC: 10963094. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.23-0285.
Mizuno S, Matsunaga S, Kasahara N, Kasahara M, Shimoo Y, Abe S J Funct Biomater. 2023; 14(8).
PMID: 37623679 PMC: 10455519. DOI: 10.3390/jfb14080435.
Okawa K, Matsunaga S, Kasahara N, Kasahara M, Tachiki C, Nakano T J Funct Biomater. 2023; 14(7).
PMID: 37504851 PMC: 10381738. DOI: 10.3390/jfb14070356.
Watanabe R, Matsugaki A, Ishimoto T, Ozasa R, Matsumoto T, Nakano T Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(13).
PMID: 35806427 PMC: 9267238. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23137423.