» Articles » PMID: 22786957

Phase Response Curves of Subthalamic Neurons Measured with Synaptic Input and Current Injection

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2012 Jul 13
PMID 22786957
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Infinitesimal phase response curves (iPRCs) provide a simple description of the response of repetitively firing neurons and may be used to predict responses to any pattern of synaptic input. Their simplicity makes them useful for understanding the dynamics of neurons when certain conditions are met. For example, the sizes of evoked phase shifts should scale linearly with stimulus strength, and the form of the iPRC should remain relatively constant as firing rate varies. We measured the PRCs of rat subthalamic neurons in brain slices using corticosubthalamic excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs; mediated by both AMPA- and NMDA-type receptors) and injected current pulses and used them to calculate the iPRC. These were relatively insensitive to both the size of the stimulus and the cell's firing rate, suggesting that the iPRC can predict the response of subthalamic nucleus cells to extrinsic inputs. However, the iPRC calculated using EPSPs differed from that obtained using current pulses. EPSPs (normalized for charge) were much more effective at altering the phase of subthalamic neurons than current pulses. The difference was not attributable to the extended time course of NMDA receptor-mediated currents, being unaffected by blockade of NMDA receptors. The iPRC provides a good description of subthalamic neurons' response to input, but iPRCs are best estimated using synaptic inputs rather than somatic current injection.

Citing Articles

The voltage and spiking responses of subthreshold resonant neurons to structured and fluctuating inputs: persistence and loss of resonance and variability.

Pena R, Rotstein H Biol Cybern. 2022; 116(2):163-190.

PMID: 35038010 DOI: 10.1007/s00422-021-00919-0.


Evidence of two modes of spiking evoked in human firing motoneurones by Ia afferent electrical stimulation.

Kudina L, Andreeva R Exp Brain Res. 2021; 239(3):719-730.

PMID: 33388907 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05998-2.


Beta-Band Resonance and Intrinsic Oscillations in a Biophysically Detailed Model of the Subthalamic Nucleus-Globus Pallidus Network.

Koelman L, Lowery M Front Comput Neurosci. 2019; 13:77.

PMID: 31749692 PMC: 6848887. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2019.00077.


Cellular and Synaptic Dysfunctions in Parkinson's Disease: Stepping out of the Striatum.

Mallet N, Delgado L, Chazalon M, Miguelez C, Baufreton J Cells. 2019; 8(9).

PMID: 31470672 PMC: 6769933. DOI: 10.3390/cells8091005.


Phase-locking and bistability in neuronal networks with synaptic depression.

Akcay Z, Huang X, Nadim F, Bose A Physica D. 2019; 364:8-21.

PMID: 31462839 PMC: 6713463. DOI: 10.1016/j.physd.2017.09.007.


References
1.
Oprisan S, Prinz A, Canavier C . Phase resetting and phase locking in hybrid circuits of one model and one biological neuron. Biophys J. 2004; 87(4):2283-98. PMC: 1304653. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.046193. View

2.
Surmeier D, Mercer J, Chan C . Autonomous pacemakers in the basal ganglia: who needs excitatory synapses anyway?. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005; 15(3):312-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.05.007. View

3.
Moran A, Bergman H, Israel Z, Bar-Gad I . Subthalamic nucleus functional organization revealed by parkinsonian neuronal oscillations and synchrony. Brain. 2008; 131(Pt 12):3395-409. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awn270. View

4.
Reyes A, Fetz E . Effects of transient depolarizing potentials on the firing rate of cat neocortical neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1993; 69(5):1673-83. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1993.69.5.1673. View

5.
Netoff T, Banks M, Dorval A, Acker C, Haas J, Kopell N . Synchronization in hybrid neuronal networks of the hippocampal formation. J Neurophysiol. 2004; 93(3):1197-208. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00982.2004. View