» Articles » PMID: 22783293

Vena Cava Thrombosis After Vena Cava Filter Placement: Incidence and Risk Factors

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2012 Jul 12
PMID 22783293
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to assess the clinical safety and efficacy of vena cava filter (VCF) placement, with particular emphasis on the incidence and risk factors of inferior vena cava thrombosis (VCT) after VCF placement.

Methods: Clinical data of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), with or without placement of VCF, were analyzed in a retrospective single-center audit of medical records from January 2005 to June 2009. The collected data included demographics, procedural details, filter type, indications, and complications.

Results: A total of 168 cases of VTE (82 with VCF; 86 without VCF) were examined. Over a median follow-up of 24.2 months, VCT occurred in 18 of 82 patients with VCFs (11 males, 7 females, mean age 55.4 years). In 86 patients without VCFs, VCT occurred in only 6 individuals (4 males, 2 females) during the study period. VCT was observed more frequently in patients fitted with VCFs than in those without VCFs (22% vs. 7.0%).

Conclusions: The incidence of VCT in patients with VTE after VCF implantation was 22% approximately. Anticoagulation therapy should be continued for all patients with VCF placement, unless there is a specific contraindication. Almost all instances of VCT in patients with VCF implants in our study occurred after stopping anticoagulation treatment. The use of VCFs is increasing, and more trials are needed to confirm their benefit and accurately assess their safety.

Citing Articles

Acute caval thrombosis leading to obstructive shock in the early post insertion period of an inferior vena cava filter: a case report and literature review.

Gao S, Chen Y, Huang Y, Dang Y, Li Y Thromb J. 2024; 22(1):7.

PMID: 38200597 PMC: 10777529. DOI: 10.1186/s12959-023-00567-3.


Phlegmasia cerulea dolens: a rare cause of shock.

Lewis C, Hensley M, Barrett J, Van Norman S, Taylor A, Horowitz J Respirol Case Rep. 2019; 7(5):e00424.

PMID: 30997109 PMC: 6452327. DOI: 10.1002/rcr2.424.


[Vena cava filter. Which indications remain in the era of differentiated anticoagulation?].

Mahnken A Radiologe. 2013; 53(3):209-15.

PMID: 23429797 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-012-2418-9.

References
1.
Martin M, Blair K, Curry T, Singh N . Vena cava filters: current concepts and controversies for the surgeon. Curr Probl Surg. 2010; 47(7):524-618. DOI: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2010.03.004. View

2.
Ye W, Liu C, Liu B, Zheng Y, Li Y, Li J . [Safety and efficiency of non-permanent inferior vena cava filters in preventing pulmonary embolism]. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2007; 29(1):55-8. View

3.
Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F, Page Y, Tardy B, Girard P . A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prévention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338(7):409-15. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199802123380701. View

4.
Patel S, Patel R . Inferior vena cava filters for recurrent thrombosis: current evidence. Tex Heart Inst J. 2007; 34(2):187-94. PMC: 1894721. View

5.
Corriere M, Sauve K, Suave K, Ayerdi J, Craven B, Stafford J . Vena cava filters and inferior vena cava thrombosis. J Vasc Surg. 2007; 45(4):789-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.048. View