Preoperative Staging of Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Whole-body Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron Emission Tomography/computed Tomography
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion-weighted imaging with background signal suppression (DWIBS) for preoperative assessment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in comparison to (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18)FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT).
Methods: Thirty-three patients with suspected NSCLC were enrolled. Patients were examined before surgery with PET/CT and whole-body MRI including T1-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE), T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and DWIBS sequences (b = 0/800). Histological or cytological specimens were taken as standard of reference.
Results: Whole-body MRI with DWIBS as well as PET/CT provided diagnostic image quality in all cases. Sensitivity for primary tumour detection: MRI 93%, PET/CT 98%. T-staging accuracy: MRI 63%, PET/CT 56%. N-staging accuracy: MRI 66%, PET/CT 71%. UICC staging accuracy: MRI 66%, PET/CT 74%. Sensitivity for metastatic involvement of individual lymph node groups: MRI 44%, PET/CT 47%. Specificity for individual non-metastatic lymph node groups: MRI 93%, PET/CT 96%. Assessment accuracy for individual lymph node groups: MRI 85%, PET/CT 88%. Observer agreement rate for UICC staging: MRI 74%, PET/CT 90%.
Conclusion: Whole-body MRI with DWIBS provides comparable results to PET/CT in staging of NSCLC, but shows no superiority. Most relevant challenges for both techniques are T-staging accuracy and sensitivity for metastatic lymph node involvement.
Key Points: Numerous radiological methods are available for the crucial staging of lung cancer. Whole-body DWIBS MRI provides comparable results to PET/CT in NSCLC staging. No evident superiority of whole-body DWIBS over PET/CT in NSCLC staging. Challenges for both techniques are T-staging and detection of small metastases.
Holmstrand H, Lindskog M, Sundin A, Hansen T Cancer Imaging. 2025; 25(1):30.
PMID: 40069778 PMC: 11895332. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-025-00852-6.
State of the Art MR Imaging for Lung Cancer TNM Stage Evaluation.
Ohno Y, Ozawa Y, Koyama H, Yoshikawa T, Takenaka D, Nagata H Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(3).
PMID: 36765907 PMC: 9913625. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030950.
State-of-the-art MR Imaging for Thoracic Diseases.
Tanaka Y, Ohno Y, Hanamatsu S, Obama Y, Ueda T, Ikeda H Magn Reson Med Sci. 2021; 21(1):212-234.
PMID: 33952785 PMC: 9199970. DOI: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2020-0184.
Zhao C, Deng D, Ye W, Long L, Lu Y, Wei Y Am J Transl Res. 2021; 13(1):88-101.
PMID: 33527010 PMC: 7847530.
Usuda K, Iwai S, Yamagata A, Iijima Y, Motono N, Matoba M Thorac Cancer. 2021; 12(5):676-684.
PMID: 33476488 PMC: 7919163. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13820.