» Articles » PMID: 22752392

Hybrid Image Visualization Tool for 3D Integration of CT Coronary Anatomy and Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion PET

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2012 Jul 4
PMID 22752392
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Multimodal cardiac imaging by CTA and quantitative PET enables acquisition of patient-specific coronary anatomy and absolute myocardial perfusion at rest and during stress. In the clinical setting, integration of this information is performed visually or using coronary arteries distribution models. We developed a new tool for CTA and quantitative PET integrated 3D visualization, exploiting XML and DICOM clinical standards.

Methods: The hybrid image tool (HIT) developed in the present study included four main modules: (1) volumetric registration for spatial matching of CTA and PET data sets, (2) an interface to PET quantitative analysis software, (3) a derived DICOM generator able to build DICOM data set from quantitative polar maps, and (4) a 3D visualization tool of integrated anatomical and quantitative flow information. The four modules incorporated in the HIT tool communicate by defined standard XML files: XML-transformation and XML MIST standards.

Results: The HIT tool implements a 3D representation of CTA showing real coronary anatomy fused to PET-derived quantitative myocardial blood flow distribution. The technique was validated on 16 data sets from EVINCI study population. The validation of the method confirmed the high matching between "original" and derived data sets as well as the accuracy of the registration procedure.

Conclusions: Three-dimensional integration of patient- specific coronary artery anatomy provided by CTA and quantitative myocardial blood flow obtained from PET imaging can improve cardiac disease assessment. The HIT tool introduced in this paper may represent a significant advancement in the clinical use of this multimodal approach.

References
1.
Di Carli M, Dorbala S, Hachamovitch R . Integrated cardiac PET-CT for the diagnosis and management of CAD. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006; 13(2):139-44. DOI: 10.1007/BF02971234. View

2.
Makela T, Clarysse P, Sipila O, Pauna N, Pham Q, Katila T . A review of cardiac image registration methods. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003; 21(9):1011-21. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2002.804441. View

3.
Saraste A, Nekolla S, Schwaiger M . Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of myocardial infarction and viability. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008; 15(1):105-17. DOI: 10.1007/BF02976902. View

4.
Neglia D, Michelassi C, Trivieri M, Sambuceti G, Giorgetti A, Pratali L . Prognostic role of myocardial blood flow impairment in idiopathic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 2002; 105(2):186-93. DOI: 10.1161/hc0202.102119. View

5.
Miller J, Rochitte C, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I . Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(22):2324-36. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806576. View