» Articles » PMID: 22748514

Avian IgY Antibodies and Their Recombinant Equivalents in Research, Diagnostics and Therapy

Overview
Journal Biologicals
Date 2012 Jul 4
PMID 22748514
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The generation and use of avian antibodies is of increasing interest in a wide variety of applications within the life sciences. Due to their phylogenetic distance, mechanisms of immune diversification and the way in which they deposit IgY immunoglobulin in the egg yolk, chickens provide a number of advantages compared to mammals as hosts for immunization. These advantages include: the one-step purification of antibodies from egg yolk in large amounts facilitates having a virtually continuous supply; the epitope spectrum of avian antibodies potentially grants access to novel specificities; the broad absence of cross-reactivity with mammalian epitopes avoids assay interference and improves the performance of immunological techniques. The polyclonal nature of IgY antibodies has limited their use since avian hybridoma techniques are not well established. Recombinant IgY, however, can be generated from mammalian monoclonal antibodies which makes it possible to further exploit the advantageous properties of the IgY scaffold. Moreover, cloning and selecting the immune repertoire from avian organisms is highly efficient, yielding antigen-specific antibody fragments. The recombinant approach is well suited to circumvent any limitations of polyclonal antibodies. This review presents comprehensive information on the generation, purification, modification and applications of polyclonal and monoclonal IgY antibodies.

Citing Articles

Innovative Approaches to Combat Duck Viral Hepatitis: Dual-Specific Anti-DHAV-1 and DHAV-3 Yolk Antibodies.

Lei S, Yang Y, Zhao C, Liu A, He P Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40006701 PMC: 11860182. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines13020154.


Avian Antibodies as Potential Therapeutic Tools.

Eriksson M, Larsson A Antibodies (Basel). 2025; 14(1).

PMID: 39982233 PMC: 11843883. DOI: 10.3390/antib14010018.


Monoclonal IgY antibodies: advancements and limitations for immunodiagnosis and immunotherapy applications.

Tabll A, Shahein Y, Omran M, Hussein N, El-Shershaby A, Petrovic A Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother. 2024; 12:25151355241264520.

PMID: 39071998 PMC: 11273732. DOI: 10.1177/25151355241264520.


Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2-Specific IgY Antibodies: Production, Reactivity, and Neutralizing Capability against Virus Variants.

Schon J, Aebischer A, Halwe N, Ulrich L, Hoffmann D, Reiche S Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(14).

PMID: 39063218 PMC: 11277173. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25147976.


Construction and Validation of Chicken Immune scFv Antibody Library against .

Gong Y, Chen X, Fan J, Sun L, He L, Wang H Microorganisms. 2024; 12(6).

PMID: 38930530 PMC: 11206095. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12061148.


References
1.
OFarrelly C, Branton D, Wanke C . Oral ingestion of egg yolk immunoglobulin from hens immunized with an enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strain prevents diarrhea in rabbits challenged with the same strain. Infect Immun. 1992; 60(7):2593-7. PMC: 257208. DOI: 10.1128/iai.60.7.2593-2597.1992. View

2.
Nguyen H, Tumpey T, Park H, Byun Y, Tran L, Nguyen V . Prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of avian antibodies against influenza virus H5N1 and H1N1 in mice. PLoS One. 2010; 5(4):e10152. PMC: 2854139. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010152. View

3.
Mahdavi A, Rahmani H, Nili N, Samie A, Soleimanian-Zad S, Jahanian R . Effects of dietary egg yolk antibody powder on growth performance, intestinal Escherichia coli colonization, and immunocompetence of challenged broiler chicks. Poult Sci. 2010; 89(3):484-94. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2009-00541. View

4.
Suzuki N, Lee Y . Site-specific N-glycosylation of chicken serum IgG. Glycobiology. 2003; 14(3):275-92. DOI: 10.1093/glycob/cwh031. View

5.
Nomura S, Suzuki H, Masaoka T, Kurabayashi K, Ishii H, Kitajima M . Effect of dietary anti-urease immunoglobulin Y on Helicobacter pylori infection in Mongolian gerbils. Helicobacter. 2005; 10(1):43-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2005.00290.x. View