» Articles » PMID: 22748096

Assessment of Renal Volume by Three-dimensional Ultrasonography in Pregnant Bitches: an Experimental Study Using Virtual Organ Computer-aided Analysis

Overview
Journal BMC Vet Res
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2012 Jul 4
PMID 22748096
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To assess and to compare the renal volume evolution in bitches during pregnancy by two-dimensional (2D) ultrasonography using the ellipsoid technique (volume = length x width x depth x 0.523) and three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography using the Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis (VOCAL) method. A longitudinal prospective study was performed with 17 normal Golden Retrievers bitches during pregnancy from heat to the last third of gestation. The ultrasound scans were performed by two veterinarians. The left and right kidneys were assessed in three moments (day 0 = non-pregnant bitches; days 1st to 20th of pregnancy and days 21st to 40th of pregnancy) by three techniques (ellipsoid; VOCAL 12° and VOCAL 30°). For reproducibility calculations, we used the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: The inferential result of the volumes in ANOVA revealed the interaction effect between side and moment (p = 0.009). The 3D techniques showed, in average, the same renal volumes (p = 0.137) regardless of the side and moment. Considering the right side, the renal volume in the day 0 was smaller than the day 21st to 40th (p = 0.029). Considering the left side, the renal volume at day 0 was smaller than the day 1st to 20th (p = 0.020) and day 21st to 40th (p = 0.007). It was found good intra observer reproducibility (ICC > 0.9) and none of the three techniques showed a good inter observer reproducibility (ICC < 0.7).

Conclusion: The renal volume bitches by 3D ultrasonography using the VOCAL method (12° and 30°) had good correlation with the volume obtained by 2D ultrasonography method.

Citing Articles

Diagnosis of pathological conditions of kidney by two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonographic imaging in dogs.

Dehmiwal D, Behl S, Singh P, Tayal R, Pal M, Chandolia R Vet World. 2016; 9(7):693-8.

PMID: 27536028 PMC: 4983118. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.693-698.


Diagnosis of urinary bladder diseases in dogs by using two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography.

Dinesh D, Behl S, Singh P, Tayal R, Pal M, Chandolia R Vet World. 2016; 8(7):819-22.

PMID: 27047159 PMC: 4774671. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.819-822.


Evaluation of gallbladder volume and contraction index with three-dimensional ultrasonography in healthy dogs.

Rahmani V, Molazem M, Jamshidi S, Vali Y, Hanifeh M J Vet Med Sci. 2015; 77(9):1157-61.

PMID: 25903917 PMC: 4591159. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.14-0537.

References
1.
Tedesco G, Bussamra L, Araujo Junior E, Britto I, Nardozza L, Moron A . Reference range of fetal renal volume by three-dimensional ultrasonography using the VOCAL method. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2009; 25(4):385-91. DOI: 10.1159/000236151. View

2.
Pang B, Kot B, Ying M . Three-dimensional ultrasound volumetric measurements: is the largest number of image planes necessary for outlining the region-of-interest?. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006; 32(8):1193-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.04.012. View

3.
Riccabona M, Fritz G, Schollnast H, Schwarz T, Deutschmann M, Mache C . Hydronephrotic kidney: pediatric three-dimensional US for relative renal size assessment--initial experience. Radiology. 2005; 236(1):276-83. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2361040158. View

4.
Raine-Fenning N, Clewes J, Kendall N, Bunkheila A, Campbell B, Johnson I . The interobserver reliability and validity of volume calculation from three-dimensional ultrasound datasets in the in vitro setting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 21(3):283-91. DOI: 10.1002/uog.61. View

5.
Gilja O, Smievoll A, Thune N, Matre K, Hausken T, Odegaard S . In vivo comparison of 3D ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in volume estimation of human kidneys. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1995; 21(1):25-32. DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(94)00082-4. View