» Articles » PMID: 22738085

Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.42 Versus Ringer's Acetate in Severe Sepsis

Abstract

Background: Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) [corrected] is widely used for fluid resuscitation in intensive care units (ICUs), but its safety and efficacy have not been established in patients with severe sepsis.

Methods: In this multicenter, parallel-group, blinded trial, we randomly assigned patients with severe sepsis to fluid resuscitation in the ICU with either 6% HES 130/0.42 (Tetraspan) or Ringer's acetate at a dose of up to 33 ml per kilogram of ideal body weight per day. The primary outcome measure was either death or end-stage kidney failure (dependence on dialysis) at 90 days after randomization.

Results: Of the 804 patients who underwent randomization, 798 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. The two intervention groups had similar baseline characteristics. At 90 days after randomization, 201 of 398 patients (51%) assigned to HES 130/0.42 had died, as compared with 172 of 400 patients (43%) assigned to Ringer's acetate (relative risk, 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.36; P=0.03); 1 patient in each group had end-stage kidney failure. In the 90-day period, 87 patients (22%) assigned to HES 130/0.42 were treated with renal-replacement therapy versus 65 patients (16%) assigned to Ringer's acetate (relative risk, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.80; P=0.04), and 38 patients (10%) and 25 patients (6%), respectively, had severe bleeding (relative risk, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.94 to 2.48; P=0.09). The results were supported by multivariate analyses, with adjustment for known risk factors for death or acute kidney injury at baseline.

Conclusions: Patients with severe sepsis assigned to fluid resuscitation with HES 130/0.42 had an increased risk of death at day 90 and were more likely to require renal-replacement therapy, as compared with those receiving Ringer's acetate. (Funded by the Danish Research Council and others; 6S ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00962156.).

Citing Articles

The influence of fluid resuscitation strategy on outcomes from dengue shock syndrome: a review of the management of 691 children in 7 Southeast Asian hospitals.

Trieu H, Vuong N, Hung N, Nguyen Minh T, Nguyen Van V, Phan T BMJ Glob Health. 2025; 10(3).

PMID: 40068930 PMC: 11904338. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017538.


Clinical efficacy of various resuscitation fluids in the management of sepsis in postoperative surgical and trauma patients: a systematic review and meta--analysis.

Wang Y, Chen K, Li X, Guan J Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2025; 19(3):275-288.

PMID: 40041106 PMC: 11867275. DOI: 10.20452/wiitm.2024.17900.


The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024.

Shime N, Nakada T, Yatabe T, Yamakawa K, Aoki Y, Inoue S Acute Med Surg. 2025; 12(1):e70037.

PMID: 39996161 PMC: 11848044. DOI: 10.1002/ams2.70037.


Ten tips on how to reduce iatrogenic acute kidney injury.

Booke H, von Groote T, Zarbock A Clin Kidney J. 2025; 18(2):sfae412.

PMID: 39950155 PMC: 11822294. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae412.


Haemodynamic management of septic shock.

Kotani Y, Ryan N, Udy A, Fujii T Burns Trauma. 2025; 13():tkae081.

PMID: 39816212 PMC: 11735046. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkae081.