» Articles » PMID: 22734468

Underage Alcohol Policies Across 50 California Cities: an Assessment of Best Practices

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2012 Jun 28
PMID 22734468
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We pursue two primary goals in this article: (1) to test a methodology and develop a dataset on U.S. local-level alcohol policy ordinances, and (2) to evaluate the presence, comprehensiveness, and stringency of eight local alcohol policies in 50 diverse California cities in relationship to recommended best practices in both public health literature and governmental recommendations to reduce underage drinking.

Methods: Following best practice recommendations from a wide array of authoritative sources, we selected eight local alcohol policy topics (e.g., conditional use permits, responsible beverage service training, social host ordinances, window/billboard advertising ordinances), and determined the presence or absence as well as the stringency (restrictiveness) and comprehensiveness (number of provisions) of each ordinance in each of the 50 cities in 2009. Following the alcohol policy literature, we created scores for each city on each type of ordinance and its associated components. We used these data to evaluate the extent to which recommendations for best practices to reduce underage alcohol use are being followed.

Results: (1) Compiling datasets of local-level alcohol policy laws and their comprehensiveness and stringency is achievable, even absent comprehensive, on-line, or other legal research tools. (2) We find that, with some exceptions, most of the 50 cities do not have high scores for presence, comprehensiveness, or stringency across the eight key policies. Critical policies such as responsible beverage service and deemed approved ordinances are uncommon, and, when present, they are generally neither comprehensive nor stringent. Even within policies that have higher adoption rates, central elements are missing across many or most cities' ordinances.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the viability of original legal data collection in the U.S. pertaining to local ordinances and of creating quantitative scores for each policy type to reflect comprehensiveness and stringency. Analysis of the resulting dataset reveals that, although the 50 cities have taken important steps to improve public health with regard to underage alcohol use and abuse, there is a great deal more that needs to be done to bring these cities into compliance with best practice recommendations.

Citing Articles

Alignment in local approaches to alcohol and cannabis control policy: A case study of California cities and counties.

Matthay E, Mousli L, Apollonio D, Schmidt L Int J Drug Policy. 2023; 119:104114.

PMID: 37441979 PMC: 10530325. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104114.


A Spatiotemporal Analysis of the Association of California City and County Cannabis Policies with Cannabis Outlet Densities.

Matthay E, Mousli L, Ponicki W, Glymour M, Apollonio D, Schmidt L Epidemiology. 2022; 33(5):715-725.

PMID: 35944153 PMC: 9345518. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001512.


Relationships Between Social Host Policies, Youth Drinking Contexts, and Age.

Price Wolf J, Islam S, Garcia-Ramirez G, Paschall M, Lipperman-Kreda S J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2021; 82(6):730-739.

PMID: 34762032 PMC: 8819614.


Impacts of New Zealand's lowered minimum purchase age on context-specific drinking and related risks.

Gruenewald P, Treno A, Ponicki W, Huckle T, Yeh L, Casswell S Addiction. 2015; 110(11):1757-66.

PMID: 26119584 PMC: 4609246. DOI: 10.1111/add.13034.


Transporting Young Passengers While Impaired: The State of the Law.

Thomas S, Kelley-Baker T, Romano E, Treffers R, Cannon C Health Behav Policy Rev. 2015; 1(4):265-277.

PMID: 25961065 PMC: 4422181. DOI: 10.14485/HBPR.1.4.2.


References
1.
Ker K, Chinnock P . Interventions in the alcohol server setting for preventing injuries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; (3):CD005244. PMC: 8883465. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005244.pub3. View

2.
Kypri K, Voas R, Langley J, Stephenson S, Begg D, Tippetts A . Minimum purchasing age for alcohol and traffic crash injuries among 15- to 19-year-olds in New Zealand. Am J Public Health. 2005; 96(1):126-31. PMC: 1470436. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.073122. View

3.
Toomey T, Wagenaar A . Environmental policies to reduce college drinking: options and research findings. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 2002; (14):193-205. DOI: 10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.193. View

4.
Dent C, Grube J, Biglan A . Community level alcohol availability and enforcement of possession laws as predictors of youth drinking. Prev Med. 2004; 40(3):355-62. PMC: 3707296. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.06.014. View

5.
Freisthler B, Gruenewald P, Treno A, Lee J . Evaluating alcohol access and the alcohol environment in neighborhood areas. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003; 27(3):477-84. DOI: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000057043.04199.B7. View