» Articles » PMID: 2273357

Social Determinants of Nutrient Intake in Smokers and Non-smokers During Pregnancy

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 1990 Sep 1
PMID 2273357
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Objective: The aim was to investigate the effects of social factors (education, income, marital status, partners' employment status, housing tenure, social class), smoking, and maternal height on the dietary intake of pregnant women.

Design: The study was a prospective investigation on a two phase sample.

Setting: The study involved women attending the antenatal clinic at a district general hospital.

Patients: A group of pregnant Caucasian women, selected because they were heavy smokers (15+ cigarettes/day) (n = 94) and a randomly selected sample of never smokers (n = 112) were studied.

Measurements And Main Results: Data on social factors were collected by interviewer administered questionnaire. A 7 day weighed intake method was used to determine dietary intake at 28 weeks gestation. In univariate analyses, income, housing tenure and social class had significant effects on intakes of both macro- and micronutrients, and maternal education and smoking had significant effects on intakes of micronutrients. Using a stepwise multivariate analysis with income, smoking and maternal education, income was a significant factor in the intake of most nutrients but this effect disappeared when social class and housing tenure factors were entered into the model. Only social class and housing tenure had any significant effect on intakes of macronutrients--energy, protein and fat. Smoking and maternal education were the most important determinants of quality of diet (nutrient density); other factors had only negligible effects. Income was the only significant factor in alcohol intake. It is suggested that the effects of social class and income are overlapping.

Conclusions: Smoking, being renters of accommodation, and being of minimum education and low social class are risk factors for poor dietary intake. It is recommended that such higher risk groups be specifically targeted for nutritional advice in pregnancy.

Citing Articles

Association of Sociodemographic, Socioeconomic and Lifestyle Characteristics with Low Protein and Energy Intake in the Healthy Swiss Population.

Wimmer R, Audetat A, Binggeli J, Schuetz P, Kaegi-Braun N Nutrients. 2023; 15(9).

PMID: 37432324 PMC: 10181371. DOI: 10.3390/nu15092200.


The shared pathoetiological effects of particulate air pollution and the social environment on fetal-placental development.

Erickson A, Arbour L J Environ Public Health. 2015; 2014:901017.

PMID: 25574176 PMC: 4276595. DOI: 10.1155/2014/901017.


Quality of pregnant women's diet in Poland - macro-elements.

Bojar I, Owoc A, Humeniuk E, Fronczak A, Walecka I Arch Med Sci. 2014; 10(2):361-5.

PMID: 24904673 PMC: 4042038. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2013.35001.


Heavy smoking during pregnancy as a marker for other risk factors of adverse birth outcomes: a population-based study in British Columbia, Canada.

Erickson A, Arbour L BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:102.

PMID: 22304990 PMC: 3339515. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-102.


Smoking and other health related behaviour in the social and environmental context.

Logan S, Spencer N Arch Dis Child. 1996; 74(2):176-9.

PMID: 8660087 PMC: 1511522. DOI: 10.1136/adc.74.2.176.


References
1.
HIBBARD B . Folates and the fetus. S Afr Med J. 1975; 49(30):1223-6. View

2.
Rush D . Examination of the relationship between birthweight, cigarette smoking during pregnancy and maternal weight gain. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1974; 81(10):746-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1974.tb00374.x. View

3.
Gilbert R, Marshman J, Schwieder M, Berg R . Caffeine content of beverages as consumed. Can Med Assoc J. 1976; 114(3):205-8. PMC: 1956955. View

4.
Graham D . Caffeine--its identity, dietary sources, intake and biological effects. Nutr Rev. 1978; 36(4):97-102. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1978.tb03717.x. View

5.
Rolschau J, Date J, Kristoffersen K . Folic acid supplement and intrauterine growth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1979; 58(4):343-6. DOI: 10.3109/00016347909154593. View