» Articles » PMID: 22728338

Odor As a Contextual Cue in Memory Reactivation in Young Infants

Overview
Date 2012 Jun 26
PMID 22728338
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Three-month-old infants were trained to move a mobile in the presence of a coconut or cherry odor (context). Six days later, a reactivation session took place. Infants were randomly assigned to 4 groups (same odor during training and reactivation, different odor during training and reactivation, no odor present during reactivation, no reactivation). A retention test was conducted 24h later in the presence of the training odor and mobile. Retention was seen only in the group of infants trained and reactivated with the same odor. This indicates that olfactory contextual cues function in a similar manner to visual and auditory contextual cues in that a novel context, or the absence of the context in which the memory was formed, are ineffective as reminders once the original memory has been forgotten.

Citing Articles

Olfactory neurogenesis and its role in fear memory modulation.

Silvas-Baltazar M, Lopez-Oropeza G, Duran P, Martinez-Canabal A Front Behav Neurosci. 2023; 17:1278324.

PMID: 37840547 PMC: 10569173. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1278324.


Odor-based context-dependent memory: influence of olfactory cues on declarative and nondeclarative memory indices.

Sorokowska A, Nord M, Stefanczyk M, Larsson M Learn Mem. 2022; 29(5):136-141.

PMID: 35483742 PMC: 9053110. DOI: 10.1101/lm.053562.121.


Mobile Sensing with Smart Wearables of the Physical Context of Distance Learning Students to Consider Its Effects on Learning.

Ciordas-Hertel G, Rodling S, Schneider J, Di Mitri D, Weidlich J, Drachsler H Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(19).

PMID: 34640969 PMC: 8512266. DOI: 10.3390/s21196649.


Making the World Behave: A New Embodied Account on Mobile Paradigm.

Sen U, Gredeback G Front Syst Neurosci. 2021; 15:643526.

PMID: 33732116 PMC: 7956955. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.643526.


Category generalization in a new context: the role of visual attention.

Goldenberg E, Johnson S Infant Behav Dev. 2015; 38:49-56.

PMID: 25601082 PMC: 4339501. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.12.001.


References
1.
SULLIVAN M, Tynes D . A conditioning analysis of infant long-term memory. Child Dev. 1979; 50(1):152-62. View

2.
Hayne H . Reactivation of infant memory: implications for cognitive development. Adv Child Dev Behav. 1987; 20:185-238. DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2407(08)60403-6. View

3.
Adler S, Borza M . Substituting new details for old? Effects of delaying postevent information on infant memory. Mem Cognit. 1994; 22(6):644-56. DOI: 10.3758/bf03209250. View

4.
Hartshorn K, Gerhardstein P, Bhatt R, Klein P, Aaron F, Wondoloski T . Developmental changes in the specificity of memory over the first year of life. Dev Psychobiol. 1998; 33(1):61-78. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2302(199807)33:1<61::aid-dev6>3.0.co;2-q. View

5.
Schroers M, Prigot J, Fagen J . The effect of a salient odor context on memory retrieval in young infants. Infant Behav Dev. 2007; 30(4):685-9. PMC: 2131722. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.05.001. View