Frei V, Giroud N
NPJ Sci Learn. 2025; 10(1):12.
PMID: 40055345
PMC: 11889142.
DOI: 10.1038/s41539-025-00306-5.
Micula A, Holmer E, Ning R, Danielsson H
Ear Hear. 2024; 46(2):433-443.
PMID: 39307930
PMC: 11825487.
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001596.
Perron M, Vuong V, Grassi M, Imran A, Alain C
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(13):e70023.
PMID: 39268584
PMC: 11393483.
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70023.
Vaisberg J, Gilmore S, Qian J, Russo F
Trends Hear. 2024; 28:23312165241273346.
PMID: 39195628
PMC: 11363059.
DOI: 10.1177/23312165241273346.
Schauwecker N, Tamati T, Moberly A
Otol Neurotol Open. 2024; 4(1):e050.
PMID: 38533348
PMC: 10962885.
DOI: 10.1097/ONO.0000000000000050.
Divergent effects of listening demands and evaluative threat on listening effort in online and laboratory settings.
Carolan P, Heinrich A, Munro K, Millman R
Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1171873.
PMID: 38333064
PMC: 10850315.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1171873.
Perceptual Learning of Noise-Vocoded Speech Under Divided Attention.
Wang H, Chen R, Yan Y, McGettigan C, Rosen S, Adank P
Trends Hear. 2023; 27:23312165231192297.
PMID: 37547940
PMC: 10408355.
DOI: 10.1177/23312165231192297.
The effect of aging on context use and reliance on context in speech: A behavioral experiment with Repeat-Recall Test.
Sun J, Zhang Z, Sun B, Liu H, Wei C, Liu Y
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:924193.
PMID: 35936762
PMC: 9354826.
DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.924193.
Poor Performer: A Distinct Entity in Cochlear Implant Users?.
Volter C, Oberlander K, Haubitz I, Carroll R, Dazert S, Thomas J
Audiol Neurootol. 2022; 27(5):356-367.
PMID: 35533653
PMC: 9533457.
DOI: 10.1159/000524107.
Evidence for cortical adjustments to perceptual decision criteria during word recognition in noise.
Vaden Jr K, Teubner-Rhodes S, Ahlstrom J, Dubno J, Eckert M
Neuroimage. 2022; 253:119042.
PMID: 35259524
PMC: 9082296.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119042.
Dual-Task Accuracy and Response Time Index Effects of Spoken Sentence Predictability and Cognitive Load on Listening Effort.
Hunter C
Trends Hear. 2021; 25:23312165211018092.
PMID: 34674579
PMC: 8543634.
DOI: 10.1177/23312165211018092.
Neural correlates of visual stimulus encoding and verbal working memory differ between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing controls.
Prince P, Paul B, Chen J, Le T, Lin V, Dimitrijevic A
Eur J Neurosci. 2021; 54(3):5016-5037.
PMID: 34146363
PMC: 8457219.
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15365.
Cortical Regions Activated by Spectrally Degraded Speech in Adults With Single Sided Deafness or Bilateral Normal Hearing.
Burton H, Reeder R, Holden T, Agato A, Firszt J
Front Neurosci. 2021; 15:618326.
PMID: 33897343
PMC: 8058229.
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.618326.
Effects of temporal order and intentionality on reflective attention to words in noise.
Chan T, Buchsbaum B, Alain C
Psychol Res. 2021; 86(2):544-557.
PMID: 33683449
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01494-6.
Role of semantic context and talker variability in speech perception of cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
ONeill E, Parke M, Kreft H, Oxenham A
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021; 149(2):1224.
PMID: 33639827
PMC: 7895533.
DOI: 10.1121/10.0003532.
Combined Brain-Perfusion SPECT and EEG Measurements Suggest Distinct Strategies for Speech Comprehension in CI Users With Higher and Lower Performance.
Kessler M, Schierholz I, Mamach M, Wilke F, Hahne A, Buchner A
Front Neurosci. 2020; 14:787.
PMID: 32848560
PMC: 7431776.
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00787.
Tracking Cognitive Spare Capacity During Speech Perception With EEG/ERP: Effects of Cognitive Load and Sentence Predictability.
Hunter C
Ear Hear. 2020; 41(5):1144-1157.
PMID: 32282402
PMC: 8784007.
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000856.
Cognitive factors contribute to speech perception in cochlear-implant users and age-matched normal-hearing listeners under vocoded conditions.
ONeill E, Kreft H, Oxenham A
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019; 146(1):195.
PMID: 31370651
PMC: 6637026.
DOI: 10.1121/1.5116009.
Making Sense of Sentences: Top-Down Processing of Speech by Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Moberly A, Reed J
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019; 62(8):2895-2905.
PMID: 31330118
PMC: 6802905.
DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-18-0472.
In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
Zekveld A, Kramer S, Ronnberg J, Rudner M
Ear Hear. 2018; 40(2):272-286.
PMID: 29923867
PMC: 6400496.
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000612.