» Articles » PMID: 22728026

Phase II Trial of Nab-paclitaxel Compared with Docetaxel As First-line Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Final Analysis of Overall Survival

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 2012 Jun 26
PMID 22728026
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A randomized phase II study in first-line MBC demonstrated superior efficacy and safety of weekly nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel. Final survival analyses and updated safety results are reported.

Patients And Methods: Three hundred two patients with no previous chemotherapy for MBC were randomized to receive nab-paclitaxel 300 mg/m(2) q3w, nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m(2) or 150 mg/m(2) the first 3 of 4 weeks (qw 3/4), or docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) q3w. The trial was powered for analyses of antitumor activity and safety.

Results: Treatment with nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) qw 3/4 resulted in a median overall survival (OS) of 33.8 months compared with 22.2, 27.7, and 26.6 months for nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m(2) qw 3/4, nab-paclitaxel 300 mg/m(2) q3w, and docetaxel, respectively (overall P = .047). Patients receiving 150 mg/m(2)nab-paclitaxel had prolonged median OS compared with those in the 100 mg/m(2)nab-paclitaxel arm (hazard ratio, 0.575; P = .008). A trend toward a longer OS was noted in the 150 mg/m(2)nab-paclitaxel arm versus docetaxel arm (hazard ratio, 0.688). Grade 3 or 4 fatigue, neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia were less frequent in all nab-paclitaxel arms compared with docetaxel.

Conclusions: Consistent with previously published efficacy results, these data suggest that 150 mg/m(2) qw 3/4 may represent the most clinically efficacious nab-paclitaxel dosing regimen for patients with no previous chemotherapy for MBC. A phase III trial confirming these results would be necessary and prudent before widespread adoption of the 150 mg/m(2) dose in clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of a functional ex vivo paclitaxel and eribulin sensitivity assay for breast cancer, the REMIT assay.

Komar Z, Verkaik N, Dahmani A, Montaudon E, Kanaar R, Houtsmuller A NPJ Breast Cancer. 2025; 11(1):17.

PMID: 39962055 PMC: 11832732. DOI: 10.1038/s41523-025-00734-x.


Three-Week Versus 4-Week Schedule of nab-Paclitaxel in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Study.

Liu Y, Song G, Di L, Jiang H, Ran R, Zhang R Oncologist. 2023; 28(12):1102-e1302.

PMID: 37882706 PMC: 10712902. DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad288.


Safety signals of albumin-bound paclitaxel: Data mining of the Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system.

Wang Y, Liu X Indian J Pharmacol. 2023; 55(3):167-173.

PMID: 37555411 PMC: 10501543. DOI: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_640_22.


A meta-analysis of the incidence and risk of skin toxicity with nab-paclitaxel and paclitaxel in cancer treatment.

Li H, Wang W, Wang Z Am J Transl Res. 2023; 15(6):4279-4290.

PMID: 37434856 PMC: 10331690.


​Efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in combination with albumin‑bound paclitaxel for the treatment of HER2‑positive advanced breast cancer: A real‑world study.

Yang L, Zheng L, Kong F, Tian X, Zhang S, Pu P Oncol Lett. 2023; 26(1):312.

PMID: 37332328 PMC: 10272970. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2023.13898.