» Articles » PMID: 22711977

Decision Making Under Time Pressure, Modeled in a Prospect Theory Framework

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2012 Jun 20
PMID 22711977
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The current research examines the effects of time pressure on decision behavior based on a prospect theory framework. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants estimated certainty equivalents for binary gains-only bets in the presence or absence of time pressure. In Experiment 3, participants assessed comparable bets that were framed as losses. Data were modeled to establish psychological mechanisms underlying decision behavior. In Experiments 1 and 2, time pressure led to increased risk attractiveness, but no significant differences emerged in either probability discriminability or outcome utility. In Experiment 3, time pressure reduced probability discriminability, which was coupled with severe risk-seeking behavior for both conditions in the domain of losses. No significant effects of control over outcomes were observed. Results provide qualified support for theories that suggest increased risk-seeking for gains under time pressure.

Citing Articles

Impact of cognitive biases on environmental compliance risk perceptions in international construction projects.

Chang T, Du Y, Deng X, Wang X Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1397306.

PMID: 39640039 PMC: 11619276. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1397306.


Time pressure effects on decision-making in intertemporal loss scenarios: an eye-tracking study.

Zhou Y, Ruan S, Zhang K, Bao Q, Liu H Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1451674.

PMID: 39463459 PMC: 11512456. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1451674.


Probabilistic causal reasoning under time pressure.

Kolvoort I, Fisher E, van Rooij R, Schulz K, Van Maanen L PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0297011.

PMID: 38603716 PMC: 11008876. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297011.


Time Pressure Affects the Risk Preference and Outcome Evaluation.

Lin C, Jia H Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(4).

PMID: 36833899 PMC: 9963851. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043205.


On the use of discrete-time quantum walks in decision theory.

Chen M, Ferro G, Sornette D PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0273551.

PMID: 36040872 PMC: 9426940. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273551.


References
1.
Busemeyer J . Decision making under uncertainty: a comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1985; 11(3):538-64. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.11.3.538. View

2.
Hertwig R, ORTMANN A . Experimental practices in economics: a methodological challenge for psychologists?. Behav Brain Sci. 2001; 24(3):383-403; discussion 403-51. DOI: 10.1037/e683322011-032. View

3.
Bowman C, Evans C, Turnbull O . Artificial time constraints on the Iowa Gambling Task: the effects on behavioural performance and subjective experience. Brain Cogn. 2005; 57(1):21-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.015. View

4.
Miller J . Information input overload and psychopathology. Am J Psychiatry. 1960; 116:695-704. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.116.8.695. View

5.
Goodie A . The effects of control on betting: paradoxical betting on items of high confidence with low value. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003; 29(4):598-610. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.598. View