» Articles » PMID: 22711226

Measuring Socioeconomic Inequality in the Incidence of AIDS: Rural-urban Considerations

Overview
Journal AIDS Behav
Date 2012 Jun 20
PMID 22711226
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Low socioeconomic status (SES) influences the risk of acquiring human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) and thus should be considered when analyzing HIV/AIDS surveillance data. Most surveillance systems do not collect individual level SES data but do collect residential ZIP code. We developed SES deprivation indices at the ZIP code tabulation area and assessed their predictive validity for AIDS incidence relative to individual neighborhood-level indicators in Florida using reliability analysis, factor analysis with principal component factorization, and structural equation modeling. For urban areas an index of poverty performed best, although the single factor poverty also performed well. For rural areas no index performed well, but the individual indicators of no access to a car and crowding performed well. In rural areas poverty was not associated with increased AIDS incidence. Users of HIV/AIDS surveillance data should consider urban and rural areas separately when assessing the impact of SES on AIDS incidence.

Citing Articles

Intimate partner violence, HIV-risk behaviors, and HIV screening among heterosexually active persons at increased risk for infection.

Cha S, Adams M, Wejnert C AIDS Care. 2022; 35(6):867-875.

PMID: 35467983 PMC: 11484947. DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2022.2067311.


Social disorganization and new HIV diagnoses, 2013-2017, Florida: Rural-urban differences.

Trepka M, Dawit R, Fernandez S, Sheehan D, Degarege A, Li T J Rural Health. 2021; 38(4):960-969.

PMID: 34861068 PMC: 9163207. DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12636.


Burden of skin disease and associated socioeconomic status in Asia: A cross-sectional analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2017.

Urban K, Chu S, Giesey R, Mehrmal S, Uppal P, Delost M JAAD Int. 2021; 2:40-50.

PMID: 34409353 PMC: 8362322. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdin.2020.10.006.


County-level predictors of retention in care status among people living with HIV in South Carolina from 2010 to 2016: a data-driven approach.

Zeng C, Zhang J, Sun X, Li Z, Weissman S, Olatosi B AIDS. 2021; 35(Suppl 1):S53-S64.

PMID: 33867489 PMC: 8098716. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002832.


The impact of socioeconomic factors on the healthcare costs of people living with HIV in Turkey.

Ozkan Ozdemir H, Tosun S, Kabadurmus F, Ozdemir D BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):368.

PMID: 32197598 PMC: 7082973. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08469-z.


References
1.
Carstairs V . Deprivation indices: their interpretation and use in relation to health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995; 49 Suppl 2:S3-8. PMC: 1060868. DOI: 10.1136/jech.49.suppl_2.s3. View

2.
Berk M, Schur C, Dunbar J, Bozzette S, Shapiro M . Short report: migration among persons living with HIV. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 57(6):1091-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00487-2. View

3.
Katz M, Hsu L, Lingo M, Woelffer G, Schwarcz S . Impact of socioeconomic status on survival with AIDS. Am J Epidemiol. 1998; 148(3):282-91. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009637. View

4.
Hart L, Larson E, Lishner D . Rural definitions for health policy and research. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95(7):1149-55. PMC: 1449333. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.042432. View

5.
Townsend P, Simpson D, Tibbs N . Inequalities in health in the city of Bristol: a preliminary review of statistical evidence. Int J Health Serv. 1985; 15(4):637-63. DOI: 10.2190/AN09-8R52-UE6B-VWUU. View