» Articles » PMID: 22708573

Assessing the Strengths of Mental Health Consumers: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Psychol Assess
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2012 Jun 20
PMID 22708573
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Strengths assessments focus on the individual's talents, abilities, resources, and strengths. No systematic review of strengths assessments for use within mental health populations has been published. The aims of this study were to describe and evaluate strengths assessments for use within mental health services. A systematic review identified 12 strengths assessments (5 quantitative, 7 qualitative). The Strengths Assessment Worksheet (SAW) was the most widely utilized and evaluated qualitative assessment. Psychometric properties of the assessments were assessed against set quality criteria. Data on psychometric properties were available for 4 measures. The Client Assessment of Strengths, Interests and Goals (CASIG) had the strongest psychometric evidence. The SAW and CASIG assessments can be tentatively recommended within clinical practice, although the evidence for all strengths assessments is currently limited. To describe the content of the strengths assessment, the items used to operationalize the concept of strengths in each assessment were extracted and themed. Twenty-four themes were identified and organized into 3 overarching categories: individual factors, environmental factors, and interpersonal factors. These categories form the basis of an empirically based definition of strengths that could be used as a conceptual foundation for new clinical assessments.

Citing Articles

Embracing a different outlook: Strengths and goals of individuals currently in treatment for anorexia nervosa.

Dann K, Harrison A, Veldre A, Hay P, Touyz S Eat Weight Disord. 2024; 29(1):63.

PMID: 39358628 PMC: 11447091. DOI: 10.1007/s40519-024-01689-x.


Identifying Patient Strengths Instruments and Examining Their Relevance for Chronic Disease Management: A Systematic Review.

Wallace D, Karmali R, Kim C, White A, Stange K, Hassmiller Lich K Prev Chronic Dis. 2021; 18:E41.

PMID: 33914678 PMC: 8091945. DOI: 10.5888/pcd18.200323.


Mobile App to Help People With Chronic Illness Reflect on Their Strengths: Formative Evaluation and Usability Testing.

Kristjansdottir O, Borosund E, Westeng M, Ruland C, Stenberg U, Zangi H JMIR Form Res. 2020; 4(3):e16831.

PMID: 32130126 PMC: 7081135. DOI: 10.2196/16831.


Development and evaluation of a strength-based method to promote employment of work-disability benefit recipients with multiple problems: a feasibility study.

Brongers K, Cornelius B, van der Klink J, Brouwer S BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):71.

PMID: 31948432 PMC: 6966846. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-8157-3.


Post-traumatic growth in mental health recovery: qualitative study of narratives.

Slade M, Rennick-Egglestone S, Blackie L, Llewellyn-Beardsley J, Franklin D, Hui A BMJ Open. 2019; 9(6):e029342.

PMID: 31256037 PMC: 6609070. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029342.