» Articles » PMID: 22707879

Comparative Effectiveness of Efavirenz-based Antiretroviral Regimens in Resource-limited Settings

Overview
Journal J Comp Eff Res
Specialty Health Services
Date 2012 Jun 19
PMID 22707879
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Efavirenz (EFV) is a non-nucleoside widely used as first-line therapy for HIV-1 infection. Most of the research available on EFV comes from trials performed in industrialized countries and only a few studies have evaluated EFV in resource-limited settings (RLSs). In this article, we present a systematic review of the available randomized-controlled trials performed in RLSs that have compared EFV with other antiretrovirals, such as nevirapine and protease inhibitors. The data derived from these studies show that both EFV and nevirapine are adequate first-line therapy options for HIV-1 infection in RLSs, even in patients with concomitant tuberculosis. However, EFV may show a slight benefit in terms of toxicity and adverse events. By contrast, the data comparing EFV versus protease inhibitors is contradictory and further studies may be required to elucidate these discrepancies.

Citing Articles

Proposal of pharmacophore model for HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors: Combined mutational effect analysis, molecular dynamics, molecular docking and pharmacophore modeling study.

Annan A, Raiss N, Lemrabet S, Elomari N, Elmir E, Filali-Maltouf A Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2024; 38:3946320241231465.

PMID: 38296818 PMC: 10832406. DOI: 10.1177/03946320241231465.


Large variability in plasma efavirenz concentration in Papua New Guinea HIV/AIDS patients associated with high frequency of CYP2B6 516T allele.

Bordin Andriguetti N, Van Schalkwyk H, Barratt D, Tucci J, Pumuye P, Somogyi A Clin Transl Sci. 2021; 14(6):2521-2531.

PMID: 34415664 PMC: 8604234. DOI: 10.1111/cts.13120.


Virologic Response to First-line Efavirenz- or Nevirapine-based Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-infected African Children.

Kekitiinwa A, Szubert A, Spyer M, Katuramu R, Musiime V, Mhute T Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017; 36(6):588-594.

PMID: 28505015 PMC: 5533213. DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001505.


Outcomes for efavirenz versus nevirapine-containing regimens for treatment of HIV-1 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pillay P, Ford N, Shubber Z, Ferrand R PLoS One. 2013; 8(7):e68995.

PMID: 23894391 PMC: 3718822. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068995.

References
1.
Cooper D, Heera J, Goodrich J, Tawadrous M, Saag M, DeJesus E . Maraviroc versus efavirenz, both in combination with zidovudine-lamivudine, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive subjects with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 infection. J Infect Dis. 2010; 201(6):803-13. DOI: 10.1086/650697. View

2.
Robbins G, de Gruttola V, Shafer R, Smeaton L, Snyder S, Pettinelli C . Comparison of sequential three-drug regimens as initial therapy for HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(24):2293-303. PMC: 4767257. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa030264. View

3.
Lennox J, DeJesus E, Lazzarin A, Pollard R, Madruga J, Berger D . Safety and efficacy of raltegravir-based versus efavirenz-based combination therapy in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 infection: a multicentre, double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009; 374(9692):796-806. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60918-1. View

4.
El-Ibiary S, Cocohoba J . Effects of HIV antiretrovirals on the pharmacokinetics of hormonal contraceptives. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008; 13(2):123-32. DOI: 10.1080/13625180701829952. View

5.
Thompson M, Aberg J, Cahn P, Montaner J, Rizzardini G, Telenti A . Antiretroviral treatment of adult HIV infection: 2010 recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA panel. JAMA. 2010; 304(3):321-33. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1004. View