» Articles » PMID: 22707845

How Friendship Network Characteristics Influence Subjective Well-Being

Overview
Journal Soc Indic Res
Date 2012 Jun 19
PMID 22707845
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This article explores how friendship network characteristics influence subjective well-being (SWB). Using data from the 2003 General Social Survey of Canada, three components of the friendship network are differentiated: number of friends, frequency of contact, and heterogeneity of friends. We argue that these characteristics shape SWB through the benefits they bring. Benefits considered are more social trust, less stress, better health, and more social support. Results confirm that higher frequency of contacts and higher number of friends, as well as lower heterogeneity of the friendship network are related to more social trust, less stress, and a better health. Frequency of contact and number of friends, as well as more heterogeneity of the friendship network increase the chance of receiving help from friends. With the exception of receiving help from friends, these benefits are in turn related to higher levels of SWB. Only the frequency of meeting friends face-to-face has a remaining positive direct influence on SWB.

Citing Articles

The effect and mechanism of mutual aid on the subjective well-being of participants under the COVID-19 pandemic.

Xu A, Zhang Y BMC Psychol. 2025; 13(1):48.

PMID: 39825462 PMC: 11748590. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-025-02360-5.


The American Friendship Project: A report on the status and health of friendship in America.

Pennington N, Hall J, Holmstrom A PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0305834.

PMID: 39078808 PMC: 11288408. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305834.


Prediction of Chronic Stress and Protective Factors in Adults: Development of an Interpretable Prediction Model Based on XGBoost and SHAP Using National Cross-sectional DEGS1 Data.

Bozorgmehr A, Weltermann B JMIR AI. 2024; 2:e41868.

PMID: 38875576 PMC: 11041452. DOI: 10.2196/41868.


Mitigating the affective and cognitive consequences of social exclusion: an integrative data analysis of seven social disconnection interventions.

Lee R, Surenkok G, Zayas V BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1250.

PMID: 38714949 PMC: 11075311. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18365-5.


Understanding the associations between the number of close friends and life satisfaction: Considering age differences.

Kang W Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1105771.

PMID: 37057175 PMC: 10086127. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105771.


References
1.
House J, Landis K, Umberson D . Social relationships and health. Science. 1988; 241(4865):540-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.3399889. View

2.
Seeman T, Berkman L . Structural characteristics of social networks and their relationship with social support in the elderly: who provides support. Soc Sci Med. 1988; 26(7):737-49. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90065-2. View

3.
Diener E . Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull. 1984; 95(3):542-75. View

4.
Haines V, Hurlbert J, Beggs J . Exploring the determinants of support provision: provider characteristics, personal networks, community contexts, and support following life events. J Health Soc Behav. 1996; 37(3):252-64. View

5.
Helliwell J, Putnam R . The social context of well-being. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004; 359(1449):1435-46. PMC: 1693420. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1522. View