» Articles » PMID: 22707744

Standard Practices for Computerized Clinical Decision Support in Community Hospitals: a National Survey

Overview
Date 2012 Jun 19
PMID 22707744
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) with clinical decision support (CDS) can help hospitals improve care. Little is known about what CDS is presently in use and how it is managed, however, especially in community hospitals. This study sought to address this knowledge gap by identifying standard practices related to CDS in US community hospitals with mature CPOE systems.

Materials And Methods: Representatives of 34 community hospitals, each of which had over 5 years experience with CPOE, were interviewed to identify standard practices related to CDS. Data were analyzed with a mix of descriptive statistics and qualitative approaches to the identification of patterns, themes and trends.

Results: This broad sample of community hospitals had robust levels of CDS despite their small size and the independent nature of many of their physician staff members. The hospitals uniformly used medication alerts and order sets, had sophisticated governance procedures for CDS, and employed staff to customize CDS.

Discussion: The level of customization needed for most CDS before implementation was greater than expected. Customization requires skilled individuals who represent an emerging manpower need at this type of hospital.

Conclusion: These results bode well for robust diffusion of CDS to similar hospitals in the process of adopting CDS and suggest that national policies to promote CDS use may be successful.

Citing Articles

Impact of Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) Coupled With Clinical Decision Support (CDS) on Radiologic Services.

Almanaa M Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69470.

PMID: 39411619 PMC: 11479669. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69470.


Impact of electronic cigarette usage on the onset of respiratory symptoms and COPD among Chinese adults.

Song B, Li H, Zhang H, Jiao L, Wu S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):5598.

PMID: 38454045 PMC: 10920732. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56368-9.


A descriptive study based on the comparison of ChatGPT and evidence-based neurosurgeons.

Liu J, Zheng J, Cai X, Wu D, Yin C iScience. 2023; 26(9):107590.

PMID: 37705958 PMC: 10495632. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107590.


Decision Support System and Web-Application Using Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Easy Cancer Classifications.

Chandrashekar K, Setlur A, Sabhapathi C A, Raiker S, Singh S, Niranjan V Cancer Inform. 2023; 22:11769351221147244.

PMID: 36714384 PMC: 9880585. DOI: 10.1177/11769351221147244.


Association between waist circumference change and incident chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among Chinese adults: a 10-year cohort study.

Ma Y, Zhao H, Su Y Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):18402.

PMID: 36319731 PMC: 9626450. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23248-z.


References
1.
Ash J, Sittig D, Poon E, Guappone K, Campbell E, Dykstra R . The extent and importance of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007; 14(4):415-23. PMC: 2244906. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2373. View

2.
Evans D, Paul Nichol W, Perlin J . Effect of the implementation of an enterprise-wide Electronic Health Record on productivity in the Veterans Health Administration. Health Econ Policy Law. 2008; 1(Pt 2):163-9. DOI: 10.1017/S1744133105001210. View

3.
Runyon M, Richman P, Kline J . Emergency medicine practitioner knowledge and use of decision rules for the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: variations by practice setting and training level. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 14(1):53-7. DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.07.032. View

4.
Ash J, Sittig D, Dykstra R, Campbell E, Guappone K . Exploring the unintended consequences of computerized physician order entry. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007; 129(Pt 1):198-202. View

5.
Garg A, Adhikari N, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano M, Devereaux P, Beyene J . Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005; 293(10):1223-38. DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223. View