» Articles » PMID: 22706960

Assessing the Impact of National Antibiotic Campaigns in Europe

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2012 Jun 19
PMID 22706960
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Because of evidence of causal association between antibiotic use and bacterial resistance, the implementation of national policies has emerged as a interesting tool for controlling and reversing bacterial resistance. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of public policies on antibiotic use in Europe using a differences-in-differences approach. Comparable data on systemic antibiotics administered in 21 European countries are available for a 11-year period between 1997 and 2007. Data on national campaigns are drawn from the public health literature. We estimate an econometric model of antibiotic consumption with country fixed effects and control for the main socioeconomic and epidemiological factors. Lagged values and the instrumental variables approach are applied to address endogeneity aspects of the prevalence of infections and the adoption of national campaigns. We find evidence that public campaigns significantly reduce the use of antimicrobials in the community by 1.3-5.6 defined daily doses per 1,000 inhabitants yearly. This represents an impact of roughly 6.5-28.3 % on the mean level of antibiotic use in Europe between 1997 and 2007. The effect is robust across different measurement methods. Further research is needed to investigate the effectiveness of policy interventions targeting different social groups such as general practitioners or patients.

Citing Articles

Assessment of global antimicrobial resistance campaigns conducted to improve public awareness and antimicrobial use behaviours: a rapid systematic review.

Gilham E, Pearce-Smith N, Carter V, Ashiru-Oredope D BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):396.

PMID: 38321479 PMC: 10848528. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-17766-w.


The Association between Perceived Annoyances in the Indoor Home Environment and Respiratory Infections: A Danish Cohort Study with up to 19 Years of Follow-Up.

Kirkegaard A, Kloster S, Davidsen M, Christensen A, Vestbo J, Nielsen N Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3).

PMID: 36767277 PMC: 9915003. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20031911.


Community drug retail outlet staff's knowledge, attitudes and practices towards non-prescription antibiotics use and antibiotic resistance in the Amhara region, Ethiopia with a focus on non-urban towns.

Belachew S, Hall L, Selvey L Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022; 11(1):64.

PMID: 35488321 PMC: 9052473. DOI: 10.1186/s13756-022-01102-1.


No prescription? No problem: drivers of non-prescribed sale of antibiotics among community drug retail outlets in low and middle income countries: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

Belachew S, Hall L, Erku D, Selvey L BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):1056.

PMID: 34082726 PMC: 8173982. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11163-3.


Non-prescription dispensing of antibiotic agents among community drug retail outlets in Sub-Saharan African countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Belachew S, Hall L, Selvey L Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021; 10(1):13.

PMID: 33446266 PMC: 7807893. DOI: 10.1186/s13756-020-00880-w.


References
1.
Tan L, Nielsen N, Young D, Trizna Z . Use of antimicrobial agents in consumer products. Arch Dermatol. 2002; 138(8):1082-6. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.138.8.1082. View

2.
Llor C, Cots J . The sale of antibiotics without prescription in pharmacies in Catalonia, Spain. Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 48(10):1345-9. DOI: 10.1086/598183. View

3.
Molstad S, Stalsby Lundborg C, Cars O . Antibiotic prescription rates vary markedly between 13 European countries. Scand J Infect Dis. 2002; 34(5):366-71. DOI: 10.1080/00365540110080034. View

4.
Filippini M, Masiero G, Moschetti K . Small area variations and welfare loss in the use of outpatient antibiotics. Health Econ Policy Law. 2008; 4(Pt 1):55-77. DOI: 10.1017/S174413310800460X. View

5.
Rudholm N . Economic implications of antibiotic resistance in a global economy. J Health Econ. 2002; 21(6):1071-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00053-x. View