» Articles » PMID: 22700119

Focal Hepatic Lesions in Gd-EOB-DTPA Enhanced MRI: the Atlas

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2012 Jun 16
PMID 22700119
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This article reviews the different technical aspects and pitfalls of gadolinium (Gd)-ethoxibenzyl (EOB)-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) and the advantages of the hepatocellular phase (HCP) and defines its specific imaging features of liver lesions.

Background: Gd-EOB-DTPA is a contrast agent with combined properties of a conventional non-specific extracellular and a hepatocyte-specific contrast agent. Benign cirrhosis-associated nodules are characterised by isointensity in dynamic imaging and the HCP. Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) usually show hyperenhancement in the arterial phase, with washout in the portal vein pressure (PVP) and hypointensity in the HCP. Among other characteristic findings, we have the mosaic pattern, a capsule, the "nodule-in-nodule" appearance and the satellite nodules. The fibrolamellar HCC is a large enhancing heterogeneous lesion, on a non-cirrhotic liver, with a hypointense scar in every sequence. THIDs (transient hepatic intensity differences) are perfusional alterations, characterised by hyperintensity in the arterial phase, with no alterations in the rest of the sequences including the HCP. Adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) are lesions, occurring more frequently in young women, with brisk arterial enhancement, differentiated by the scar and the uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA in the HCP. Focal eosinophilic infiltration is a difficult diagnosis, with characteristics such as a non-spherical shape and irregular borders suggesting it. Besides these lesions, in which Gd-EOB-DTPA has a clear advantage, there are a few where the specificities of this agent can be troublesome: haemangiomas, focal fat/sparing, foreign body reaction, cholangiocarcinoma and metastases.

Conclusion: Gd-EOB-DTPA is comparable to extracellular agents, and uptake by functioning hepatocytes in the delayed phase provides additional information that further improves detection and characterisation of many hepatic lesions.

Main Messages: Gd-EOB-DTPA offers advantages for the imaging of many liver lesions including HCC, fibrolamellar HCC, FNH and adenoma. • The properties of Gd-EOB-DTPA can pose problems when dealing with haemangiomas, cholangiocarcinoma and metastases among others. • The uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA by functioning hepatocytes in the delayed phase provides additional information that further improves detection and characterisation of many hepatic lesions.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the potential of abbreviated MRI protocols for liver metastasis detection: a study in colorectal cancer patients.

Emir S, Gursu M, Bulut S Pol J Radiol. 2025; 90:e19-e25.

PMID: 40070420 PMC: 11891548. DOI: 10.5114/pjr/196906.


I thought it was a hemangioma! A pictorial essay about common and uncommon liver hemangiomas' mimickers.

Bonatti M, Valletta R, Corato V, Gorgatti T, Posteraro A, Vingiani V Insights Imaging. 2024; 15(1):228.

PMID: 39298015 PMC: 11413281. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01745-1.


Prediction of survival and analysis of prognostic factors for hepatocellular carcinoma: a 20-year of imaging diagnosis in Upper Northern Thailand.

Nakharutai N, Chitapanarux I, Traisathit P, Srikummoon P, Pojchamarnwiputh S, Inmutto N BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):1063.

PMID: 37923991 PMC: 10625219. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11429-6.


Liver involvement in a hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia patient with Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI: a case description.

Jiang J, Wang X, Yang D, Yang Z Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022; 12(9):4691-4697.

PMID: 36060585 PMC: 9403578. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-45.


Characterization and Prediction of Signal Intensity Changes in Normal Liver Parenchyma on Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI Scans after Liver-directed Radiation Therapy.

Nehlsen A, Sindhu K, Wolken T, Khan F, Kyriakakos C, Ward S Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2022; 4(4):e210100.

PMID: 35904411 PMC: 9358658. DOI: 10.1148/rycan.210100.


References
1.
Kim S, Kim S, Lee J, Kim M, Jeon Y, Park Y . Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus triple-phase MDCT for the preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 192(6):1675-81. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1262. View

2.
Reimer P, Schneider G, Schima W . Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver: properties, clinical development and applications. Eur Radiol. 2004; 14(4):559-78. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2236-1. View

3.
Levy A . Malignant liver tumors. Clin Liver Dis. 2002; 6(1):147-64. DOI: 10.1016/s1089-3261(03)00070-9. View

4.
Kitao A, Zen Y, Matsui O, Gabata T, Kobayashi S, Koda W . Hepatocellular carcinoma: signal intensity at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR Imaging--correlation with molecular transporters and histopathologic features. Radiology. 2010; 256(3):817-26. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10092214. View

5.
Brancatelli G, Federle M, Vullierme M, Lagalla R, Midiri M, Vilgrain V . CT and MR imaging evaluation of hepatic adenoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006; 30(5):745-50. DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000224630.48068.bf. View