» Articles » PMID: 22693554

A Self-organized Model for Cell-differentiation Based on Variations of Molecular Decay Rates

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Jun 14
PMID 22693554
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Systemic properties of living cells are the result of molecular dynamics governed by so-called genetic regulatory networks (GRN). These networks capture all possible features of cells and are responsible for the immense levels of adaptation characteristic to living systems. At any point in time only small subsets of these networks are active. Any active subset of the GRN leads to the expression of particular sets of molecules (expression modes). The subsets of active networks change over time, leading to the observed complex dynamics of expression patterns. Understanding of these dynamics becomes increasingly important in systems biology and medicine. While the importance of transcription rates and catalytic interactions has been widely recognized in modeling genetic regulatory systems, the understanding of the role of degradation of biochemical agents (mRNA, protein) in regulatory dynamics remains limited. Recent experimental data suggests that there exists a functional relation between mRNA and protein decay rates and expression modes. In this paper we propose a model for the dynamics of successions of sequences of active subnetworks of the GRN. The model is able to reproduce key characteristics of molecular dynamics, including homeostasis, multi-stability, periodic dynamics, alternating activity, differentiability, and self-organized critical dynamics. Moreover the model allows to naturally understand the mechanism behind the relation between decay rates and expression modes. The model explains recent experimental observations that decay-rates (or turnovers) vary between differentiated tissue-classes at a general systemic level and highlights the role of intracellular decay rate control mechanisms in cell differentiation.

Citing Articles

Antagonistic Functions of Androgen Receptor and NF-κB in Prostate Cancer-Experimental and Computational Analyses.

Basilio J, Hochreiter B, Hoesel B, Sheshori E, Mussbacher M, Hanel R Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(24).

PMID: 36551650 PMC: 9776608. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246164.


Cancer and Chaos and the Complex Network Model of a Multicellular Organism.

Gecow A, Iantovics L, Tez M Biology (Basel). 2022; 11(9).

PMID: 36138796 PMC: 9495805. DOI: 10.3390/biology11091317.


On the underlying assumptions of threshold Boolean networks as a model for genetic regulatory network behavior.

Tran V, McCall M, McMurray H, Almudevar A Front Genet. 2013; 4:263.

PMID: 24376454 PMC: 3859184. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00263.


Stationary distribution of self-organized states and biological information generation.

Woo H Sci Rep. 2013; 3:3329.

PMID: 24281357 PMC: 3839033. DOI: 10.1038/srep03329.


Protein complex formation: computational clarification of the sequential versus probabilistic recruitment puzzle.

Scholling M, Thurner S, Hanel R PLoS One. 2013; 8(2):e55046.

PMID: 23383305 PMC: 3562237. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055046.


References
1.
de Jong H, Geiselmann J, Hernandez C, Page M . Genetic Network Analyzer: qualitative simulation of genetic regulatory networks. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19(3):336-44. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btf851. View

2.
Glass L, Kauffman S . The logical analysis of continuous, non-linear biochemical control networks. J Theor Biol. 1973; 39(1):103-29. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(73)90208-7. View

3.
Shmulevich I, Lahdesmaki H, Dougherty E, Astola J, Zhang W . The role of certain Post classes in Boolean network models of genetic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(19):10734-9. PMC: 202352. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1534782100. View

4.
BURG M, Kwon E, Kultz D . Osmotic regulation of gene expression. FASEB J. 1996; 10(14):1598-606. DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.10.14.9002551. View

5.
Bossi A, Lehner B . Tissue specificity and the human protein interaction network. Mol Syst Biol. 2009; 5:260. PMC: 2683721. DOI: 10.1038/msb.2009.17. View