» Articles » PMID: 22690631

Pollinator Effectiveness Varies with Experimental Shifts in Flowering Time

Overview
Journal Ecology
Date 2012 Jun 14
PMID 22690631
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The earlier flowering times exhibited by many plant species are a conspicuous sign of climate change. Altered phenologies have caused concern that species could suffer population declines if they flower at times when effective pollinators are unavailable. For two perennial wildflowers, Tradescantia ohiensis and Asclepias incarnata, we used an experimental approach to explore how changing phenology affects the taxonomic composition of the pollinator assemblage and the effectiveness of individual pollinator taxa. After finding in the previous year that fruit set varied with flowering time, we manipulated flowering onset in greenhouses, placed plants in the field over the span of five weeks, and measured pollinator effectiveness as the number of seeds produced after a single visit to a flower. The average effectiveness of pollinators and the expected rates of pollination success were lower for plants of both species flowering earlier than for plants flowering at historical times, suggesting there could be reproductive costs to earlier flowering. Whereas for A. incarnata, differences in average seed set among weeks were due primarily to changes in the composition of the pollinator assemblage, the differences for T. ohiensis were driven by the combined effects of compositional changes and increases over time in the effectiveness of some pollinator taxa. Both species face the possibility of temporal mismatch between the availability of the most effective pollinators and the onset of flowering, and changes in the effectiveness of individual pollinator taxa through time may add an unexpected element to the reproductive consequences of such mismatches.

Citing Articles

Pollinator functional group abundance and floral heterogeneity in an agroecological context affect mating patterns in a self-incompatible wild plant.

Labonte A, Le Corre V, Matejicek A, Felten E, Turpin M, Laurent E Am J Bot. 2024; 111(12):e16440.

PMID: 39592516 PMC: 11659934. DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.16440.


Solar Panels as Novel Nest Sites for the European Paper Wasp .

Tew N, Levin M, Hernandez R Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(11):e70608.

PMID: 39568769 PMC: 11578646. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70608.


Interannual temperature rise leads to more uniform phenological matching between invasive and pollinators across elevations.

Miao C, Du J, Wang W, Wu J, Wu L, Zhang K Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1445083.

PMID: 39464287 PMC: 11502355. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1445083.


Alpine grassland community productivity and diversity differences influence significantly plant sexual reproduction strategies.

Kang X, Liu Y, Wu X, Jiang J, Duan L, Zhang A PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(8):pgae297.

PMID: 39131914 PMC: 11310588. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae297.


Oligosaccharide production and signaling correlate with delayed flowering in an Arabidopsis genotype grown and selected in high [CO2].

Kinmonth-Schultz H, Walker S, Bingol K, Hoyt D, Kim Y, Markillie L PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0287943.

PMID: 38153952 PMC: 10754469. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287943.


References
1.
Jurgens A, Bosch S, Webber A, Witt T, Frame D, Gottsberger G . Pollination biology of Eulophia alta (Orchidaceae) in Amazonia: effects of pollinator composition on reproductive success in different populations. Ann Bot. 2009; 104(5):897-912. PMC: 2749546. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp191. View

2.
Bradley N, Leopold A, Ross J, Huffaker W . Phenological changes reflect climate change in Wisconsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(17):9701-4. PMC: 22273. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.17.9701. View

3.
Miller-Rushing A, Primack R . Global warming and flowering times in Thoreau's Concord: a community perspective. Ecology. 2008; 89(2):332-41. DOI: 10.1890/07-0068.1. View

4.
Forrest J, Thomson J . Consequences of variation in flowering time within and among individuals of Mertensia fusiformis (Boraginaceae), an early spring wildflower. Am J Bot. 2011; 97(1):38-48. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0900083. View

5.
Rafferty N, Ives A . Effects of experimental shifts in flowering phenology on plant-pollinator interactions. Ecol Lett. 2010; 14(1):69-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01557.x. View