» Articles » PMID: 22674676

Bony Pelvis Dimensions in Women with and Without Stress Urinary Incontinence

Overview
Date 2012 Jun 8
PMID 22674676
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: To test the null hypothesis that bony pelvis dimensions are similar in women with and without stress urinary incontinence (SUI), both in the postpartum and midlife periods.

Methods: Secondary analyses were performed of two case-control studies comparing women with SUI to asymptomatic controls. One study examined primiparas in the first 9-12 months postpartum; the other study involved middle-aged women. SUI was confirmed by full-bladder stress test. All subjects underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. The interspinous and intertuberous diameters, subpubic angle, and sacrococcygeal joint-to-the inferior pubic point distance were measured from the images independently by two authors.

Results: In the young cohorts, we compared primiparas with de novo postpartum SUI to both continent primiparas and nulliparas. Postpartum SUI is associated with a wider subpubic angle. There is also a trend towards wider interspinous and intertuberous diameters in the stress-incontinent primiparas as compared to the continent cohorts, although this did not reach statistical significance with our sample sizes. By contrast, no significant differences in bony pelvis dimensions were identified when comparing middle-aged women with SUI and their continent controls.

Conclusions: Bony pelvis dimensions are different in women with SUI than in matched continent controls. However, these differences are only identified in young primiparas in the postpartum period, not in middle-aged women.

Citing Articles

An International Continence Society (ICS)/ International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) joint report on the terminology for the assessment and management of obstetric pelvic floor disorders.

Doumouchtsis S, de Tayrac R, Lee J, Daly O, Melendez-Munoz J, Lindo F Int Urogynecol J. 2022; 34(1):1-42.

PMID: 36443462 PMC: 9834366. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05397-x.


The variation in shape and thickness of the pelvic floor musculature in males and females: a geometric-morphometric analysis.

Stansfield E, Mitteroecker P, Umek W, Fischer B Int Urogynecol J. 2022; 34(2):453-461.

PMID: 35930006 PMC: 9870833. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05311-5.


The evolution of pelvic canal shape and rotational birth in humans.

Stansfield E, Fischer B, Grunstra N, Pouca M, Mitteroecker P BMC Biol. 2021; 19(1):224.

PMID: 34635119 PMC: 8507337. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-021-01150-w.


Evolution of the human pelvis and obstructed labor: new explanations of an old obstetrical dilemma.

Pavlicev M, Romero R, Mitteroecker P Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 222(1):3-16.

PMID: 31251927 PMC: 9069416. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.043.


Fetal head size and effect of manual perineal protection.

Jansova M, Kalis V, Rusavy Z, Raisanen S, Lobovsky L, Laine K PLoS One. 2017; 12(12):e0189842.

PMID: 29287104 PMC: 5747446. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189842.


References
1.
Farage M, Miller K, Berardesca E, Maibach H . Psychosocial and societal burden of incontinence in the aged population: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007; 277(4):285-90. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-007-0505-3. View

2.
Morgan D, Umek W, Stein T, Hsu Y, Guire K, DeLancey J . Interrater reliability of assessing levator ani muscle defects with magnetic resonance images. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006; 18(7):773-8. PMC: 2289432. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-006-0224-5. View

3.
DeLancey J, Low L, Miller J, Patel D, Tumbarello J . Graphic integration of causal factors of pelvic floor disorders: an integrated life span model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199(6):610.e1-5. PMC: 2764236. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.001. View

4.
NOLL L, HUTCH J . The SCIPP line--an aid in interpreting the voiding lateral cystourethrogram. Obstet Gynecol. 1969; 33(5):680-9. View

5.
Chou Q, DeLancey J . A structured system to evaluate urethral support anatomy in magnetic resonance images. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185(1):44-50. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.116368. View