» Articles » PMID: 22673927

Recognition of Adverse Drug Events in Older Hospitalized Medical Patients

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2012 Jun 8
PMID 22673927
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess medical teams' ability to recognize adverse drug events (ADEs) in older inpatients.

Methods: The study cohort comprised 250 patients aged 65 years or older consecutively admitted to Internal Medicine wards of three hospitals in the Netherlands between April and November 2007. An independent expert team identified ADEs present upon admission or occurring during hospitalization by a structured retrospective patient chart review. For all ADEs identified, the expert team assessed causality, severity, preventability, and recognition by medical teams.

Results: The medical teams did not recognize 19.9 % of all ADEs present upon admission {60.4 ADEs [95 % confidence interval (CI) 51.5-70.8] per 100 hospitalizations} and 20.3 % of all ADEs occurring during the hospital stay [47.2 ADEs (95 % CI 39.4-56.5) per 100 hospitalizations]. Unrecognized ADEs were significantly more often ADEs with possible causality (p=0.014, df=1), ADEs caused by medication errors (p<0.001, df=1), and ADEs not manifesting as new symptoms (p<0.001, df=1). The medical teams did not recognize 23.2 % of mild to moderately severe ADEs and 16.5 % of severe, life-threatening, or fatal ADEs. The recognition of ADEs varied with event type.

Conclusions: The recognition of ADEs by medical teams was substantial for those ADEs with evident causality and with clinically apparent and severe consequences. ADEs mimicking underlying pathologies with a lower severity went unrecognized much more often, as did those resulting only in abnormal laboratory values. Tools to improve the recognition of ADEs by medical teams should, therefore, focus on those ADEs that are more challenging to detect.

Citing Articles

Factors influencing central nervous system medication deprescribing and behavior change in hospitalized older adults.

Pavon J, Zhang A, Fish L, Falkovic M, Colon-Emeric C, Gallagher D J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024; 72(8):2359-2371.

PMID: 38826146 PMC: 11323177. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19011.


Burden of death and disability due to adverse effects of medical treatment in India: An analysis using the global burden of disease 2019 study data.

Kamath A, Acharya S, Bharathi R P Heliyon. 2024; 10(2):e24924.

PMID: 38312580 PMC: 10835318. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24924.


Jordanians' knowledge, attitude and practice regarding adverse drug reactions reporting.

El-Dahiyat F, Hammour K, Farha R, Manaseer Q, Al Momanee A, Allan A Saudi Pharm J. 2023; 31(7):1197-1201.

PMID: 37273263 PMC: 10236368. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.05.016.


Electronic health record-based prediction models for in-hospital adverse drug event diagnosis or prognosis: a systematic review.

Yasrebi-de Kom I, Dongelmans D, de Keizer N, Jager K, Schut M, Abu-Hanna A J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023; 30(5):978-988.

PMID: 36805926 PMC: 10114128. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad014.


Automatic Detection of Adverse Drug Events in Geriatric Care: Study Proposal.

Gaspar F, Lutters M, Beeler P, Lang P, Burnand B, Rinaldi F JMIR Res Protoc. 2022; 11(11):e40456.

PMID: 36378522 PMC: 9709671. DOI: 10.2196/40456.


References
1.
Drickamer M, Levy B, Irwin K, Rohrbaugh R . Perceived needs for geriatric education by medical students, internal medicine residents and faculty. J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21(12):1230-4. PMC: 1924752. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00585.x. View

2.
Olde Rikkert M, Rigaud A, van Hoeyweghen R, de Graaf J . Geriatric syndromes: medical misnomer or progress in geriatrics?. Neth J Med. 2003; 61(3):83-7. View

3.
Nebeker J, Hoffman J, Weir C, Bennett C, Hurdle J . High rates of adverse drug events in a highly computerized hospital. Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165(10):1111-6. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.165.10.1111. View

4.
Bowman L, Carlstedt B, Hancock E, Black C . Adverse drug reaction (ADR) occurrence and evaluation in elderly inpatients. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1996; 5(1):9-18. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1557(199601)5:1<9::AID-PDS192>3.0.CO;2-2. View

5.
Fritz D, Ceschi A, Curkovic I, Huber M, Egbring M, Kullak-Ublick G . Comparative evaluation of three clinical decision support systems: prospective screening for medication errors in 100 medical inpatients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012; 68(8):1209-19. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-012-1241-6. View