» Articles » PMID: 22669547

Durability of a Cruciate-retaining TKA with Modular Tibial Trays at 20 Years

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2012 Jun 7
PMID 22669547
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Modular tibial trays have been utilized in TKA for more than 20 years. However, concerns have been raised about modular implants and it is unclear whether these devices are durable in the long term.

Questions/purposes: We determined (1) survival, (2) relationship of age and polyethylene thickness with revision, (3) function, and (4) radiographic lucencies and osteolysis in patients having a single TKA implant at 20-year followup.

Methods: We prospectively followed 75 patients implanted with 101 Press-Fit Condylar(®) (Johnson and Johnson Professional, Inc, Raynham, MA, USA) posterior cruciate-retaining TKAs (with modular tibial trays) between 1988 and 1991. At 20 years, 59 patients were deceased. We clinically evaluated the living 16 patients (22 knees) and contacted the relatives of all deceased patients to confirm implant status. We clinically assessed 14 of the 16 patients with the Knee Society score, WOMAC, and UCLA and Tegner activity level scores. Radiographically, we determined lucencies, component migration, and osteolysis. We performed survival analysis including all original patients. Minimum followup was 20 years (mean, 20.6 years; range, 20-21.8 years).

Results: Six reoperations were performed in five patients (6% rate of revision) over the 20-year followup. All revisions were related to polyethylene wear and occurred at least 10 years after the primary procedure. Survivorship with revision for any reason as the end point was 91% (95% CI, 0.83-0.97) at 20 years. Average Knee Society clinical and functional scores were 90 (range, 60-100) and 59 (range, 30-87), respectively.

Conclusions: Our data demonstrate the durability of this posterior cruciate-retaining TKA design. The data provide a standard for newer designs and newer bearing surface materials at comparable followup.

Citing Articles

Factors affecting aseptic loosening in primary total knee replacements: an in vitro study.

Lionberger D, Wattenbarger L, Conlon C, Walker T J Exp Orthop. 2020; 7(1):41.

PMID: 32504155 PMC: 7275102. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-020-00243-9.


Blood Metal Ion Release After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.

Reiner T, Sorbi R, Muller M, Nees T, Kretzer J, Rickert M Orthop Surg. 2020; 12(2):396-403.

PMID: 32023362 PMC: 7189061. DOI: 10.1111/os.12591.


Unacceptable failure rate of a ceramic-coated posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty.

Lionberger D, Conlon C, Wattenbarger L, Walker T Arthroplast Today. 2019; 5(2):187-192.

PMID: 31286042 PMC: 6588685. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2019.02.002.


How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up.

Evans J, Walker R, Evans J, Blom A, Sayers A, Whitehouse M Lancet. 2019; 393(10172):655-663.

PMID: 30782341 PMC: 6381229. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32531-5.


Patellofemoral design enhancements reduce long-term complications of postero-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Jan N, Fontaine C, Migaud H, Pasquier G, Valluy J, Saffarini M Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 27(4):1241-1250.

PMID: 30203198 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5137-6.


References
1.
Engh G, Koralewicz L, Pereles T . Clinical results of modular polyethylene insert exchange with retention of total knee arthroplasty components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(4):516-23. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200004000-00007. View

2.
Collier J, Sperling D, Currier J, Sutula L, Saum K, Mayor M . Impact of gamma sterilization on clinical performance of polyethylene in the knee. J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11(4):377-89. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(96)80026-x. View

3.
Fetzer G, Callaghan J, Templeton J, Goetz D, Sullivan P, Kelley S . Posterior cruciate-retaining modular total knee arthroplasty: a 9- to 12-year follow-up investigation. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17(8):961-6. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.34824. View

4.
White S, Paxson R, Tanner M, Whiteside L . Effects of sterilization on wear in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; (331):164-71. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199610000-00023. View

5.
Bellamy N, BUCHANAN W, Goldsmith C, Campbell J, Stitt L . Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988; 15(12):1833-40. View