» Articles » PMID: 22669271

Quality of Life and Patients' Satisfaction After Otoplasty

Overview
Date 2012 Jun 7
PMID 22669271
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of the study was to present the long-term results of satisfaction and quality of life of patients after otoplasty due to protuberant ears. A retrospective study at an academic tertiary referral centre is presented. A total of 164 patients were followed up after otoplasty due to ear dysplasia grade I. The validated questionnaires SF-36 and Patient Outcomes of Surgery-head/neck (POS) were applied to evaluate the quality of life and the patients' satisfaction after therapy. The comparison of preoperative and postoperative quality of life measured by POS showed significantly higher scores after surgery than before, independent of gender, age or experience of the surgeon. The patients' satisfaction with the surgical outcome showed high values in all subgroups. Except for "vitality", the SF-36 showed for all other items higher values of postoperative quality of life for patients after otoplasty than the German control population. With this study, we were able to demonstrate that health-related quality of life of patients is significantly increased by otoplasty. This finding is most pronounced in early childhood (children younger than 10 years of age), but independent of gender, experience of the surgeon or whether a revision or a primary case was treated. The method of performing otoplasty as described in this paper has been used in our institution for many years. It is adapted to the specific pathology and combines resection with suture techniques. To confirm and complement our results and increase the knowledge in this field of surgery, a prospective study is not only needed but currently performed.

Citing Articles

Bilateral Keloid Formation after Otoplasty in the Presence of Prolonged Mask Wearing.

Hoch C, Funk P, Storck K, San Nicolo M, Jacobi C Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023; 11(6):e5086.

PMID: 37396838 PMC: 10313286. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005086.


Complication Rates From Otoplasty at a Tertiary Facial Plastic Surgery Center: A Retrospective Analysis.

Alawadh I, Alassiry H, Bogari A, Alabduljabbar Z, Aldosari B J Craniofac Surg. 2022; 33(6):1813-1815.

PMID: 35013069 PMC: 9432815. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008455.


Psychosocial effects of otoplasty in adult patients: a prospective cohort study.

Sirin S, Abaci F, Selcuk A, Findik O, Yildirim A Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019; 276(5):1533-1539.

PMID: 30887168 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05391-y.


Evidence and evidence gaps in therapies of nasal obstruction and rhinosinusitis.

Rotter N GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 15:Doc06.

PMID: 28025606 PMC: 5169079. DOI: 10.3205/cto000133.


[Otoplasty and quality of life].

Braun T, Berghaus A HNO. 2014; 63(1):28, 30-3.

PMID: 25527381 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-014-2957-7.


References
1.
Schwentner I, Schmutzhard J, Deibl M, Sprinzl G . Health-related quality of life outcome of adult patients after otoplasty. J Craniofac Surg. 2006; 17(4):629-35. DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200607000-00004. View

2.
Billings A, MOOS R . The role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the stress of life events. J Behav Med. 1981; 4(2):139-57. DOI: 10.1007/BF00844267. View

3.
Scharer S, Farrior E, Farrior R . Retrospective analysis of the Farrior technique for otoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007; 9(3):167-73. DOI: 10.1001/archfaci.9.3.167. View

4.
Cano S, Browne J, Lamping D, Roberts A, McGrouther D, Black N . The Patient Outcomes of Surgery-Head/Neck (POS-head/neck): a new patient-based outcome measure. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006; 59(1):65-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.04.060. View

5.
CONVERSE J, WOOD-SMITH D . Technical details in the surgical correction of the lop ear deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1963; 31:118-28. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-196302000-00002. View