» Articles » PMID: 22667681

Influence of Needle Insertion Speed on Backflow for Convection-enhanced Delivery

Overview
Journal J Biomech Eng
Date 2012 Jun 7
PMID 22667681
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fluid flow back along the outer surface of a needle (backflow) can be a significant problem during the direct infusion of drugs into brain tissues for procedures such as convection-enhanced delivery (CED). This study evaluates the effects of needle insertion speed (0.2 and 1.8 mm/s) as well as needle diameter and flow rate on the extent of backflow and local damage to surrounding tissues. Infusion experiments were conducted on a transparent tissue phantom, 0.6% (w/v) agarose hydrogel, to visualize backflow. Needle insertion experiments were also performed to evaluate local damage at the needle tip and to back out the prestress in the surrounding media for speed conditions where localized damage was not excessive. Prestress values were then used in an analytical model of backflow. At the higher insertion speed (1.8 mm/s), local insertion damage was found to be reduced and backflow was decreased. The compressive prestress at the needle-tissue interface was estimated to be approximately constant (0.812 kPa), and backflow distances were similar regardless of needle gauge (22, 26, and 32 gauge). The analytical model underestimated backflow distances at low infusion flow rates and overestimated backflow at higher flow rates. At the lower insertion speed (0.2 mm/s), significant backflow was measured. This corresponded to an observed accumulation of material at the needle tip which produced a gap between the needle and the surrounding media. Local tissue damage was also evaluated in excised rat brain tissues, and insertion tests show similar rate-dependent accumulation of tissue at the needle tip at the lower insertion speed. These results indicate that local tissue damage and backflow may be avoided by using an appropriate insertion speed.

Citing Articles

Convection-Enhanced Delivery in Children: Techniques and Applications.

Aquilina K, Chakrapani A, Carr L, Kurian M, Hargrave D Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2022; 45:199-228.

PMID: 35976451 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-99166-1_6.


Convection-enhanced delivery with controlled catheter movement: A parametric finite element analysis.

Mehta J, Rausch M, Rylander C Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2022; 38(9):e3635.

PMID: 35763587 PMC: 9516958. DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3635.


Constant Pressure Convection-Enhanced Delivery Increases Volume Dispersed With Catheter Movement in Agarose.

Mehta J, Morales B, Hsu F, Rossmeisl J, Rylander C J Biomech Eng. 2022; 144(11).

PMID: 35656789 PMC: 9254693. DOI: 10.1115/1.4054729.


Design and Validation of a Multi-Point Injection Technology for MR-Guided Convection Enhanced Delivery in the Brain.

Prezelski K, Keiser M, Stein J, Lucas T, Davidson B, Gonzalez-Alegre P Front Med Technol. 2022; 3:725844.

PMID: 35047955 PMC: 8757778. DOI: 10.3389/fmedt.2021.725844.


Reducing Passive Drug Diffusion from Electrophoretic Drug Delivery Devices through Co-Ion Engineering.

Chen S, Renny M, Tome L, Olmedo-Martinez J, Udabe E, Jenkins E Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021; 8(12):2003995.

PMID: 34194928 PMC: 8224430. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202003995.


References
1.
Rogawski M . Convection-enhanced delivery in the treatment of epilepsy. Neurotherapeutics. 2009; 6(2):344-51. PMC: 2753495. DOI: 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.01.017. View

2.
Ivanchenko O, Sindhwani N, Linninger A . Experimental techniques for studying poroelasticity in brain phantom gels under high flow microinfusion. J Biomech Eng. 2010; 132(5):051008. DOI: 10.1115/1.4001164. View

3.
Bjornsson C, Oh S, Al-Kofahi Y, Lim Y, Smith K, Turner J . Effects of insertion conditions on tissue strain and vascular damage during neuroprosthetic device insertion. J Neural Eng. 2006; 3(3):196-207. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/3/3/002. View

4.
Morrison P, Chen M, Chadwick R, Lonser R, Oldfield E . Focal delivery during direct infusion to brain: role of flow rate, catheter diameter, and tissue mechanics. Am J Physiol. 1999; 277(4):R1218-29. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1999.277.4.R1218. View

5.
Howard 3rd M, Abkes B, Ollendieck M, Noh M, Ritter R, Gillies G . Measurement of the force required to move a neurosurgical probe through in vivo human brain tissue. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1999; 46(7):891-4. DOI: 10.1109/10.771205. View