» Articles » PMID: 22665926

Evaluation of the Sensitivity of Scout Radiographs on Unenhanced Helical CT in Identifying Ureteric Calculi: a Large UK Tertiary Referral Centre Experience

Overview
Journal Br J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2012 Jun 6
PMID 22665926
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Unenhanced helical CT for kidney, ureter and bladder (CT KUB) has become the standard investigation for renal colic. This study aims to determine the sensitivity of scout radiographs in detecting ureteric calculi using CT KUB as a standard reference.

Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who presented with acute flank pain and were investigated using CT KUB. 201 patients with positive ureteric calculi were included. Two radiologists independently reviewed the scout radiographs with access to CT KUB images. Each observer recorded the presence or absence of calculi, location, size and mean Hounsfield units of each calculus.

Results: 203 ureteric calculi were analysed from 201 patients. The overall sensitivity of scout radiographs for Observer A was 42.3% and for Observer B 52.2%, with an interobserver reliability κ-value of 0.78. The significance of mean Hounsfield units and size between two groups of patients with visible stones and those not visible were tested; the p-value for both variables was <0.0001, which is statistically significant. The study found that calculi in the upper ureter and larger than 4 mm are more likely to be seen on the scout radiograph.

Conclusions: Usage of CT scout radiography should be encouraged and reported routinely in conjunction with CT KUB as a baseline for treatment follow-up.

Citing Articles

The value of X-ray digital tomosynthesis in the diagnosis of urinary calculi.

Liu S, Wang H, Feng W, Hu X, Guo J, Shang Q Exp Ther Med. 2018; 15(2):1749-1753.

PMID: 29434761 PMC: 5774395. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.5531.


Kidney stones and imaging: what can your radiologist do for you?.

Renard-Penna R, Martin A, Conort P, Mozer P, Grenier P World J Urol. 2014; 33(2):193-202.

PMID: 25344895 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1416-0.


Use of computed tomography scout film and Hounsfield unit of computed tomography scan in predicting the radio-opacity of urinary calculi in plain kidney, ureter and bladder radiographs.

Chua M, Gomez O, Sapno L, Lim S, Morales Jr M Urol Ann. 2014; 6(3):218-23.

PMID: 25125894 PMC: 4127858. DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.134270.


Scout view in pediatric CT neuroradiological evaluation: do not underestimate!.

Orman G, Bosemani T, Tekes A, Poretti A, Huisman T Childs Nerv Syst. 2013; 30(2):307-11.

PMID: 24085494 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-013-2288-0.

References
1.
Smith R, Verga M, McCarthy S, Rosenfield A . Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996; 166(1):97-101. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.166.1.8571915. View

2.
Tamm E, Silverman P, Shuman W . Evaluation of the patient with flank pain and possible ureteral calculus. Radiology. 2003; 228(2):319-29. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2282011726. View

3.
Liu W, Esler S, Kenny B, Goh R, Rainbow A, Stevenson G . Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic: assessment of ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent. Radiology. 2001; 215(1):51-4. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap4051. View

4.
Levine J, Neitlich J, Verga M, Dalrymple N, Smith R . Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology. 1997; 204(1):27-31. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.204.1.9205218. View

5.
Smith R, Rosenfield A, Choe K, Essenmacher K, Verga M, Glickman M . Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology. 1995; 194(3):789-94. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.194.3.7862980. View