» Articles » PMID: 22649635

Changes in the Proteasome Pool During Malignant Transformation of Mouse Liver Cells

Overview
Journal Acta Naturae
Specialty Biology
Date 2012 Jun 1
PMID 22649635
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Multiple forms of proteasomes regulate cellular processes by destroying proteins or forming the peptides involved in those processes. Various pathologies, including carcinogenesis, are related to changes in the functioning of the proteasome forms. In this study, we looked at the changes in the pool of liver proteasomes during nodular regenerative hyperplasia and formation of adenoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in mice treated with Dipin, followed by partial liver resection. The relative content of various proteasome forms was determined using Western blot analysis. The chymotrypsin-like activity of proteasomes was assessed from the hydrolysis of the commercial Suc-LLVY-AMC substrate. It was found that changes in the proteasome pool appeared already during the formation of diffuse nodules, the changes being the increased expression of the X(β5) constitutive subunit and the LMP7(β5i) and LMP2(β1i) immune subunits, accompanied by the increase of the total proteasome pool and the decrease in the chymotrypsin-like activity. These changes were more pronounced in hepatocellular carcinoma. The content of the total proteasome pool and the LMP2(β1i) immune subunit and the chymotrypsin-like activity in adenoma were intermediate compared to those in the samples of liver with diffuse nodules and carcinoma. In addition, the level of the Rpt6 subunit present in the 19S proteasome activator was increased in carcinoma. Our results indicate that nodular regenerative hyperplasia and adenomatosis may be stages preceding carcinogenesis. We also conclude that there is a need to find signalling pathways that change the expression of various proteasome subunits during carcinogenesis. The 19S proteasome activator, which is overexpressed in malignant tumours, can be a promising target for the development of new anticancer drugs.

Citing Articles

26S Proteasome Non-ATPase Regulatory Subunits 1 (PSMD1) and 3 (PSMD3) as Putative Targets for Cancer Prognosis and Therapy.

Rubio A, Bencomo-Alvarez A, Young J, Velazquez V, Lara J, Gonzalez M Cells. 2021; 10(9).

PMID: 34572038 PMC: 8472613. DOI: 10.3390/cells10092390.


Proteasomes in Patient Rectal Cancer and Different Intestine Locations: Where Does Proteasome Pool Change?.

Erokhov P, Kulikov A, Karpova Y, Rodoman G, Sumedi I, Goncharov A Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(5).

PMID: 33807574 PMC: 7961961. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13051108.


Combined Effect of Bortezomib and Menadione Sodium Bisulfite on Proteasomes of Tumor Cells: The Dramatic Decrease of Bortezomib Toxicity in a Preclinical Trial.

Astakhova T, Morozov A, Erokhov P, Mikhailovskaya M, Akopov S, Chupikova N Cancers (Basel). 2018; 10(10).

PMID: 30257462 PMC: 6209890. DOI: 10.3390/cancers10100351.


Proteasome functioning in breast cancer: connection with clinical-pathological factors.

Shashova E, Lyupina Y, Glushchenko S, Slonimskaya E, Savenkova O, Kulikov A PLoS One. 2014; 9(10):e109933.

PMID: 25329802 PMC: 4201529. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109933.

References
1.
Gobbi G, Mirandola P, Micheloni C, Solenghi E, Sponzilli I, Artico M . Expression of HLA class I antigen and proteasome subunits LMP-2 and LMP-10 in primary vs. metastatic breast carcinoma lesions. Int J Oncol. 2004; 25(6):1625-9. View

2.
Uryvaeva I . A model of hepatic regeneration and carcinogenesis due to total liver cell injury induced by dipin and partial hepatectomy. Monogr Dev Biol. 1992; 23:230-6. View

3.
Voigt A, Salzmann U, Seifert U, Dathe M, Soza A, Kloetzel P . 20S proteasome-dependent generation of an IEpp89 murine cytomegalovirus-derived H-2L(d) epitope from a recombinant protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007; 355(2):549-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.02.006. View

4.
Sharova N . [Immune proteasomes and immunity]. Ontogenez. 2006; 37(3):171-8. View

5.
Uryvaeva I . [A model of regeneration of the liver damaged by dipin]. Biull Eksp Biol Med. 1997; 124(10):364-8. View