» Articles » PMID: 22633129

Hand Position Alters Vision by Biasing Processing Through Different Visual Pathways

Overview
Journal Cognition
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychology
Date 2012 May 29
PMID 22633129
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study investigated the mechanisms responsible for the difference between visual processing of stimuli near and far from the observer's hands. The idea that objects near the hands are immediate candidates for action led us to hypothesize that vision near the hands would be biased toward the action-oriented magnocellular visual pathway that supports processing with high temporal resolution but low spatial resolution. Conversely, objects away from the hands are not immediate candidates for action and, therefore, would benefit from a bias toward the perception-oriented parvocellular visual pathway that supports processing with high spatial resolution but low temporal resolution. We tested this hypothesis based on the psychophysical characteristics of the two pathways. Namely, we presented subjects with two tasks: a temporal-gap detection task which required the high temporal acuity of the magnocellular pathway and a spatial-gap detection task that required the spatial acuity of the parvocellular pathway. Consistent with our prediction, we found better performance on the temporal-gap detection task and worse performance on the spatial-gap detection task when stimuli were presented near the hands compared to when they were far from the hands. These findings suggest that altered visual processing near the hands may be due to changes in the contribution of the two visual pathways.

Citing Articles

Temporal mechanisms underlying visual processing bias in peri-hand space.

Maurya A, Shukla A, Thomas T Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(8):2659-2671.

PMID: 39627397 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02980-w.


Action does not drive visual biases in peri-tool space.

McManus R, Thomas L Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023; 86(2):525-535.

PMID: 38127254 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02826-x.


Similarities of SNARC, cognitive Simon, and visuomotor Simon effects in terms of response time distributions, hand-stimulus proximity, and temporal dynamics.

Yan L, Ma Y, Yang W, Xiang X, Nan W Psychol Res. 2023; 88(2):607-620.

PMID: 37594569 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-023-01866-0.


Opposing influences of global and local stimulus-hand proximity on crosstalk interference in dual tasks.

Ellinghaus R, Janczyk M, Wirth R, Kunde W, Fischer R, Liepelt R Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023; 76(11):2461-2478.

PMID: 36765279 PMC: 10585940. DOI: 10.1177/17470218231157548.


Does hand proximity enhance letter identification?.

Grossi G, Olmstead A, Lukaszewski D PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0280991.

PMID: 36706115 PMC: 9882917. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280991.