» Articles » PMID: 22628968

Determination of Thickness of Palatal Mucosa

Overview
Date 2012 May 26
PMID 22628968
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The palatal masticatory mucosa is widely used as a donor material in periodontal plastic surgery. The thickness of graft tissue is an important factor for the graft survival. The purpose of this study was to determine the thickness of palatal mucosa by a bone sounding technique. The association of age and gender with the thickness of palatal mucosa was also examined.

Materials And Methods: Twenty four healthy subjects had participated in the study. The younger age group of 16-30 years consisted of 12 subjects of 7 females and 5 males, and the older age group of 31-54 years consisted of 12 subjects, of 5 females and 7 males. A bone sounding method using a periodontal probe was done to assess the thickness of palatal mucosa at 15 measurement sites defined according to the gingival margin and palatal line. Mann-Whitney test was used to determine the difference in mucosal thickness between both the groups.

Results: The younger age group had thinner mucosa ranged from 2 to 3.1 mm in thickness than the older age group which ranged from 3.2 to 3.7 mm. In the same age group, females had thinner mucosa than males in the same age group. The mean thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa ranged from 2.5 to 3.7 mm.

Conclusion: The younger subjects had thinner mucosa than older subjects. The canine and premolar areas appeared to be the most appropriate donor site for grafting procedures.

Citing Articles

Pilot Study of Laser Doppler Measurement of Flow Variability in the Microcirculation of the Palatal Mucosa.

Le Bars P, Niagha G, Kouadio A, Demoersman J, Roy E, Armengol V Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016:5749150.

PMID: 27340663 PMC: 4908244. DOI: 10.1155/2016/5749150.


Gingival Biotype Assessment in a Healthy Periodontium: Transgingival Probing Method.

Manjunath R, Rana A, Sarkar A J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9(5):ZC66-9.

PMID: 26155566 PMC: 4484158. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13759.5956.


Evaluation of variation in the palatal gingival biotypes using an ultrasound device.

Rajpoot N, Nayak A, Nayak R, Bankur P J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9(3):ZC56-60.

PMID: 25954707 PMC: 4413157. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12041.5724.


Histological assessment of the palatal mucosa and greater palatine artery with reference to subepithelial connective tissue grafting.

Cho K, Yu S, Lee M, Lee D, Kim H Anat Cell Biol. 2013; 46(3):171-6.

PMID: 24179691 PMC: 3811855. DOI: 10.5115/acb.2013.46.3.171.

References
1.
McGuire M . Coverage of the denuded root surface using the free soft tissue autograft. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990; 121(2):277-9. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1990.0244. View

2.
Seibert J . Reconstruction of deformed, partially edentulous ridges, using full thickness onlay grafts. Part I. Technique and wound healing. Compend Contin Educ Dent (Lawrenceville). 1983; 4(5):437-53. View

3.
Turck D . A HISTOLOGIC COMPARISON OF THE EDENTULOUS DENTURE AND NON-DENTURE BEARING TISSUES. J Prosthet Dent. 1965; 15:419-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(65)80010-5. View

4.
Wara-Aswapati N, Pitiphat W, Chandrapho N, Rattanayatikul C, Karimbux N . Thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa associated with age. J Periodontol. 2001; 72(10):1407-12. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1407. View

5.
Studer S, Allen E, Rees T, Kouba A . The thickness of masticatory mucosa in the human hard palate and tuberosity as potential donor sites for ridge augmentation procedures. J Periodontol. 1997; 68(2):145-51. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.2.145. View