» Articles » PMID: 22628488

Clinical Significance of the Differentiation Between Mycobacterium Avium and Mycobacterium Intracellulare in M Avium Complex Lung Disease

Overview
Journal Chest
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2012 May 26
PMID 22628488
Citations 78
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare are grouped together as the M avium complex; however, little is known about the clinical impact of this species differentiation. This study compared the clinical features and prognoses of patients with M avium and M intracellulare lung disease.

Methods: From 2000 to 2009, 590 patients were given a new diagnosis of M avium complex lung disease; 323 (55%) had M avium lung disease, and 267 (45%) had M intracellulare lung disease.

Results: Compared with the patients with M avium lung disease, the patients with M intracellulare lung disease were more likely to have the following characteristics: older age (64 vs 59 years, P = .002), a lower BMI (19.5 kg/m² vs 20.6 kg/m², P < .001), respiratory symptoms such as cough (84% vs 74%, P = .005), a history of previous treatment for TB (51% vs 31%, P < .001), the fibrocavitary form of the disease (26% vs 13%, P < .001), smear-positive sputum (56% vs 38%, P < .001), antibiotic therapy during the 24 months of follow-up (58% vs 42%, P < .001), and an unfavorable microbiologic response after combination antibiotic treatment (56% vs 74%, P = .001).

Conclusions: Patients with M intracellulare lung disease exhibited a more severe presentation and had a worse prognosis than patients with M avium lung disease in terms of disease progression and treatment response. Therefore, species differentiation between M avium and M intracellulare may have prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Citing Articles

Diversity and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Mycobacterium avium complex clinical isolates in Thailand based on whole genome comparative analysis.

Sawaswong V, Wongjarit K, Petsong S, Yuliani Y, Somsukpiroh U, Faksri K Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):772.

PMID: 39755794 PMC: 11700178. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84511-z.


Clinical Predictors of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Lung Disease and Coisolates of Potential Pathogenic Microorganisms in Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis.

Wang P, Shu C, Sheu C, Chang C, Hsieh M, Hsu W Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024; 11(8):ofae427.

PMID: 39145140 PMC: 11322833. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae427.


Formative evaluation and structural analysis of non-tuberculosis mycobacterial biofilm using material pieces.

Yamamoto K, Torigoe S, Kobayashi H Cell Surf. 2024; 11:100125.

PMID: 38799511 PMC: 11126951. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcsw.2024.100125.


Broad-Spectrum In Vitro Activity of α-Aroyl--Aryl-Phenylalanine Amides against Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria and Comparative Analysis of RNA Polymerases.

Lang M, Ganapathy U, Abdelaziz R, Dick T, Richter A Antibiotics (Basel). 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38786132 PMC: 11117372. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13050404.


CT findings as predictive factors for treatment failure in Mycobacterium abscessus complex lung disease: a retrospective cohort study.

Chiang P, Huang Y, Huang Y, Lee M, Kang V, Shu C Jpn J Radiol. 2024; 42(8):852-861.

PMID: 38705936 PMC: 11286655. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-024-01570-y.