» Articles » PMID: 22623265

Reading Aloud: the Cumulative Lexical Interference Effect

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2012 May 25
PMID 22623265
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Picture naming shows a cumulative semantic interference effect: Latency for naming a target picture increases as a function of the number of pictures semantically similar to the target that have previously been named (Howard, Nickels, Coltheart, & Cole-Virtue, Cognition 100:464-482, 2006). Howard and colleagues, and also Oppenheim, Dell, and Schwartz (Cognition 114:227-252, 2010), argued that this occurs because of the joint presence in the picture-naming system of three critical properties: shared activation, priming, and competition. They also discussed the possibility that whenever any cognitive system possesses these three properties, a cumulative similarity-based interference effect from repeated use of that cognitive system will occur. We investigated this possibility by looking for a cumulative lexical interference effect when the task is reading aloud: Will the latency of reading a target word aloud increase as a function of the number of words orthographically/phonologically similar to the target that have previously been read aloud? We found that this was so. This supports the general idea that cumulative similarity-based interference effects will arise whenever any cognitive system that possesses the three key properties of shared activation, priming, and competition is repeatedly used.

Citing Articles

Adaptive lexical processing of semantic competitors extends to alternative names: Evidence from blocked-cyclic picture naming.

Wohner S, Madebach A, Schriefers H, Jescheniak J Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024; :17470218241245107.

PMID: 38514252 PMC: 11905327. DOI: 10.1177/17470218241245107.


Investigating the mechanisms of written word production: Insights from the written blocked cyclic naming paradigm.

Breining B, Rapp B Read Writ. 2019; 32(1):65-94.

PMID: 30686861 PMC: 6342477. DOI: 10.1007/s11145-017-9742-4.


Does segmental overlap help or hurt? Evidence from blocked cyclic naming in spoken and written production.

Breining B, Nozari N, Rapp B Psychon Bull Rev. 2015; 23(2):500-6.

PMID: 26179140 PMC: 4715795. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0900-x.


Single-word predictions of upcoming language during comprehension: Evidence from the cumulative semantic interference task.

Kleinman D, Runnqvist E, Ferreira V Cogn Psychol. 2015; 79:68-101.

PMID: 25917550 PMC: 4457568. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.04.001.


What can we learn about visual attention to multiple words from the word-word interference task?.

Mulatti C, Ceccherini L, Coltheart M Mem Cognit. 2014; 43(1):121-32.

PMID: 25052252 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0450-x.


References
1.
Coltheart M, Rastle K, Perry C, Langdon R, Ziegler J . DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychol Rev. 2001; 108(1):204-56. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204. View

2.
Oppenheim G, Dell G, Schwartz M . The dark side of incremental learning: a model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition. 2009; 114(2):227-52. PMC: 2924492. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007. View

3.
Damian M, Vigliocco G, Levelt W . Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition. 2001; 81(3):B77-86. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00135-4. View

4.
Navarrete E, Mahon B, Caramazza A . The cumulative semantic cost does not reflect lexical selection by competition. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010; 134(3):279-89. PMC: 2908277. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.009. View

5.
Mulatti C, Reynolds M, Besner D . Neighborhood effects in reading aloud: new findings and new challenges for computational models. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006; 32(4):799-810. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.799. View