» Articles » PMID: 22615753

Does the Precision of a Biological Clock Depend Upon Its Period? Effects of the Duper and Tau Mutations in Syrian Hamsters

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 May 23
PMID 22615753
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mutations which alter the feedback loops that generate circadian rhythms may provide insight into their insensitivity to perturbation robustness) and their consistency of period (precision). I examined relationships between endogenous period, activity and rest (τ(DD), α and ρ) in Syrian hamsters using two different mutations, duper and tau, both of which speed up the circadian clock. I generated 8 strains of hamsters that are homozygous or heterozygous for the tau, duper, and wild type alleles in all combinations. The endogenous period of activity onsets among these strains ranged from 17.94+0.04 to 24.13 ± 0.04 h. Contrary to predictions, the variability of period was unrelated to its absolute value: all strains showed similar variability of τ(DD) when activity onsets and acrophase were used as phase markers. The τ(DD) of activity offsets was more variable than onsets but also differed little between genotypes. Cycle variation and precision were not correlated with τ(DD) within any strain, and only weakly correlated when all strains are considered together. Only in animals homozygous for both mutations (super duper hamsters) were cycle variation and precision reduced. Rhythm amplitude differed between strains and was positively correlated with τ(DD) and precision. All genotypes showed negative correlations between α and ρ. This confirms the expectation that deviations in the duration of subjective day and night should offset one another in order to conserve circadian period, even though homeostatic maintenance of energy reserves predicts that longer intervals of activity or rest would be followed by longer durations of rest or activity. Females consistently showed greater variability of the period of activity onset and acrophase, and of α, but variability of the period of offset differed between sexes only in super duper hamsters. Despite the differences between genotypes in τ(DD), ρ was consistently more strongly correlated with the preceding than the succeeding α.

Citing Articles

The duper mutation reveals previously unsuspected functions of in circadian entrainment and heart disease.

Sisson C, Bahiru M, Manoogian E, Bittman E Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(32):e2121883119.

PMID: 35930669 PMC: 9371649. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2121883119.


Circadian Responses to Light in the BTBR Mouse.

Vijaya Shankara J, Horsley K, Cheng N, Rho J, Antle M J Biol Rhythms. 2022; 37(5):498-515.

PMID: 35722987 PMC: 9452857. DOI: 10.1177/07487304221102279.


is a null mutation of Cryptochrome 1 in Syrian hamsters.

Lee Y, Cal-Kayitmazbatir S, Francey L, Bahiru M, Hayer K, Wu G Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(18):e2123560119.

PMID: 35471909 PMC: 9170138. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2123560119.


Heritable gene expression variability and stochasticity govern clonal heterogeneity in circadian period.

Nikhil K, Korge S, Kramer A PLoS Biol. 2020; 18(8):e3000792.

PMID: 32745129 PMC: 7425987. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000792.


Circadian Function in Multiple Cell Types Is Necessary for Proper Timing of the Preovulatory LH Surge.

Bittman E J Biol Rhythms. 2019; 34(6):622-633.

PMID: 31530063 PMC: 9206841. DOI: 10.1177/0748730419873511.


References
1.
Qin X, Byrne M, Xu Y, Mori T, Johnson C . Coupling of a core post-translational pacemaker to a slave transcription/translation feedback loop in a circadian system. PLoS Biol. 2010; 8(6):e1000394. PMC: 2885980. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000394. View

2.
Taylor S, Gunawan R, Petzold L, Doyle F . Sensitivity Measures for Oscillating Systems: Application to Mammalian Circadian Gene Network. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2009; 53:177-188. PMC: 2707818. DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2007.911364. View

3.
Gallego M, Eide E, Woolf M, Virshup D, Forger D . An opposite role for tau in circadian rhythms revealed by mathematical modeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(28):10618-23. PMC: 1502281. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0604511103. View

4.
Karatsoreos I, Wang A, Sasanian J, Silver R . A role for androgens in regulating circadian behavior and the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Endocrinology. 2007; 148(11):5487-95. PMC: 3281763. DOI: 10.1210/en.2007-0775. View

5.
Hague J, Gilbert S, Burgess H, Ferguson S, Dawson D . A sedentary day: effects on subsequent sleep and body temperatures in trained athletes. Physiol Behav. 2003; 78(2):261-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00975-7. View