» Articles » PMID: 22610656

Shared Pollinators and Pollen Transfer Dynamics in Two Hybridizing Species, Rhinanthus Minor and R. Angustifolius

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2012 May 22
PMID 22610656
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gene flow between hybridizing plant species depends strongly on pollinator behaviour, which affects pollen transfer among floral types and reproductive isolation. We examined bumblebee behaviour and pollen transfer between two hybridizing Rhinanthus species that are very similar in ecology and floral traits. The two species, Rhinanthus minor and R. angustifolius, shared similar pollinator guilds and assemblages, but pollinator recruitment and flower visitation rates were higher in R. angustifolius sites, probably because of its higher reward levels and better visibility. When presented with Rhinanthus flowers, bumblebees that previously foraged on R. angustifolius were less prone to visit R. minor inflorescences, while R. minor foragers accepted both species in similar proportions. Although Rhinanthus has been cited as a case of mechanical isolation resulting from interactions between bee behaviour and differences in stigma and anther placement, we found no support for efficient mechanical reproductive isolation. Bumblebees that foraged on R. minor flowers carried more pollen, but pollen placement on their bodies was similar to that of bees that visited R. angustifolius, and cross-specific stigmatic pollen deposition was similar in both directions. However, the asymmetry in pollinator handling time between the two species, due to dissimilar pollen rewards, may have lowered relative heterospecific pollen receipt on R. angustifolius, suggesting that net gene flow resulting from pollen transfer dynamics is more likely towards R. minor, although this effect remains weak and will be most likely counterbalanced by context-based labile pollinator preference.

Citing Articles

Nectar supplementation changes pollinator behaviour and pollination mode in Pedicularis dichotoma: implications for evolutionary transitions.

Tong Z, Wang X, Wu L, Huang S Ann Bot. 2018; 123(2):373-380.

PMID: 29878060 PMC: 6344217. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcy102.


Safe sites of pollen placement: a conflict of interest between plants and bees?.

Tong Z, Huang S Oecologia. 2017; 186(1):163-171.

PMID: 29134400 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-3999-9.


Both morph- and species-dependent asymmetries affect reproductive barriers between heterostylous species.

Keller B, de Vos J, Schmidt-Lebuhn A, Thomson J, Conti E Ecol Evol. 2016; 6(17):6223-44.

PMID: 27648239 PMC: 5016645. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2293.


Evidence for asymmetrical hybridization despite pre- and post-pollination reproductive barriers between two Silene species.

Zhang J, Montgomery B, Huang S AoB Plants. 2016; 8.

PMID: 27178066 PMC: 4940505. DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plw032.


Demonstration of pollinator-mediated competition between two native Impatiens species, Impatiens noli-tangere and I. textori (Balsaminaceae).

Tokuda N, Hattori M, Abe K, Shinohara Y, Nagano Y, Itino T Ecol Evol. 2015; 5(6):1271-7.

PMID: 25859332 PMC: 4377270. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1431.


References
1.
Devaux C, Lande R . Displacement of flowering phenologies among plant species by competition for generalist pollinators. J Evol Biol. 2009; 22(7):1460-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01762.x. View

2.
Harder L . Behavioral responses by bumble bees to variation in pollen availability. Oecologia. 2017; 85(1):41-47. DOI: 10.1007/BF00317341. View

3.
Gomez J, Bosch J, Perfectti F, Fernandez J, Abdelaziz M, Camacho J . Association between floral traits and rewards in Erysimum mediohispanicum (Brassicaceae). Ann Bot. 2008; 101(9):1413-20. PMC: 2710261. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcn053. View

4.
Grant V . Modes and origins of mechanical and ethological isolation in angiosperms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994; 91(1):3-10. PMC: 42875. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.3. View

5.
Schemske D, Bradshaw Jr H . Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(21):11910-5. PMC: 18386. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.21.11910. View