» Articles » PMID: 22610067

Early Impact of Social Isolation and Breast Tumor Progression in Mice

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2012 May 22
PMID 22610067
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evidence from cancer patients and animal models of cancer indicates that exposure to psychosocial stress can promote tumor growth and metastasis, but the pathways underlying stress-induced cancer pathogenesis are not fully understood. Social isolation has been shown to promote tumor progression. We examined the impact of social isolation on breast cancer pathogenesis in adult female severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice using the human breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-231, a high β-adrenergic receptor (AR) expressing line. When group-adapted mice were transferred into single housing (social isolation) one week prior to MB-231 tumor cell injection into a mammary fat pad (orthotopic), no alterations in tumor growth or metastasis were detected compared to group-housed mice. When social isolation was delayed until tumors were palpable, tumor growth was transiently increased in singly-housed mice. To determine if sympathetic nervous system activation was associated with increased tumor growth, spleen and tumor norepinephrine (NE) was measured after social isolation, in conjunction with tumor-promoting macrophage populations. Three days after transfer to single housing, spleen weight was transiently increased in tumor-bearing and non-tumor-bearing mice in conjunction with reduced splenic NE concentration and elevated CD11b+Gr-1+ macrophages. At day 10 after social isolation, no changes in spleen CD11b+ populations or NE were detected in singly-housed mice. In the tumors, social isolation increased CD11b+Gr-1+, CD11b+Gr-1-, and F4/80+ macrophage populations, with no change in tumor NE. The results indicate that a psychological stressor, social isolation, elicits dynamic but transient effects on macrophage populations that may facilitate tumor growth. The transiency of the changes in peripheral NE suggest that homeostatic mechanisms may mitigate the impact of social isolation over time. Studies are underway to define the neuroendocrine mechanisms underlying the tumor-promoting effects of social isolation, and to determine the contributions of increased tumor macrophages to tumor pathogenesis.

Citing Articles

Subcutaneous ameliorates the effects of early life adversity alone or in combination with chronic stress during adulthood in male and female mice.

Mazzari G, Lowry C, Langgartner D, Reber S Neurobiol Stress. 2023; 26:100568.

PMID: 37727147 PMC: 10506060. DOI: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2023.100568.


Role of stress in the pathogenesis of cancer (Review).

Lempesis I, Georgakopoulou V, Papalexis P, Chrousos G, Spandidos D Int J Oncol. 2023; 63(5).

PMID: 37711028 PMC: 10552722. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2023.5572.


Social Isolation Activates Dormant Mammary Tumors, and Modifies Inflammatory and Mitochondrial Metabolic Pathways in the Rat Mammary Gland.

de Oliveira Andrade F, Jin L, Clarke R, Wood I, Dutton M, Anjorin C Cells. 2023; 12(6).

PMID: 36980301 PMC: 10047513. DOI: 10.3390/cells12060961.


'Invisible actors'-How poor methodology reporting compromises mouse models of oncology: A cross-sectional survey.

Nunamaker E, Reynolds P PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0274738.

PMID: 36264974 PMC: 9584398. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274738.


Using Mice to Model Human Disease: Understanding the Roles of Baseline Housing-Induced and Experimentally Imposed Stresses in Animal Welfare and Experimental Reproducibility.

Hylander B, Repasky E, Sexton S Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(3).

PMID: 35158694 PMC: 8833596. DOI: 10.3390/ani12030371.


References
1.
Antoni M, Lutgendorf S, Cole S, Dhabhar F, Sephton S, Green McDonald P . The influence of bio-behavioural factors on tumour biology: pathways and mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006; 6(3):240-8. PMC: 3146042. DOI: 10.1038/nrc1820. View

2.
Raju B, Haug S, Ibrahim S, Heyeraas K . Sympathectomy decreases size and invasiveness of tongue cancer in rats. Neuroscience. 2007; 149(3):715-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.07.048. View

3.
Engler H, Bailey M, Engler A, Sheridan J . Effects of repeated social stress on leukocyte distribution in bone marrow, peripheral blood and spleen. J Neuroimmunol. 2004; 148(1-2):106-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2003.11.011. View

4.
Palanza P, Gioiosa L, Parmigiani S . Social stress in mice: gender differences and effects of estrous cycle and social dominance. Physiol Behav. 2001; 73(3):411-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(01)00494-2. View

5.
Gabrilovich D, Nagaraj S . Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009; 9(3):162-74. PMC: 2828349. DOI: 10.1038/nri2506. View