» Articles » PMID: 22595099

Potential of Ceiba Pentandra (L.) Gaertn. (kapok Fiber) As a Resource for Second Generation Bioethanol: Effect of Various Simple Pretreatment Methods on Sugar Production

Overview
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2012 May 19
PMID 22595099
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The importance of bioethanol currently has increased tremendously as it can reduce the total dependency on fossil-fuels, especially gasoline, in the transportation sector. In this study, Ceiba pentandra (kapok fiber) was introduced as a new resource for bioethanol production. The results of chemical composition analysis showed that the cellulose (alpha- and beta-) contents were 50.7%. The glucose composition of the fiber was 59.8%. The high glucose content indicated that kapok fiber is a potential substrate for bioethanol production. However, without a pretreatment, the kapok fiber only yielded 0.8% of reducing sugar by enzymatic hydrolysis. Thus, it is necessary to pre-treat the kapok fiber prior to hydrolysis. Taking into account environmentally friendliness, only simple pretreatments with minimum chemical or energy consumption was considered. It was interesting to see that by adopting merely water, acid and alkaline pretreatments, the yield of reducing sugar was increased to 39.1%, 85.2% and >100%, respectively.

Citing Articles

Biobased Kapok Fiber Nano-Structure for Energy and Environment Application: A Critical Review.

Zerga A, Tahir M Molecules. 2022; 27(22).

PMID: 36432208 PMC: 9699385. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27228107.


Modification Strategies of Kapok Fiber Composites and Its Application in the Adsorption of Heavy Metal Ions and Dyes from Aqueous Solutions: A Systematic Review.

Futalan C, Choi A, Soriano H, Cabacungan M, Millare J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(5).

PMID: 35270400 PMC: 8910290. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052703.


Arbuscular mycorrhizal association enhances drought tolerance potential of promising bioenergy grass (Saccharum arundinaceum retz.).

Mirshad P, Puthur J Environ Monit Assess. 2016; 188(7):425.

PMID: 27329476 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5428-7.