» Articles » PMID: 22594914

Touching and Feeling: Differences in Pleasant Touch Processing Between Glabrous and Hairy Skin in Humans

Overview
Journal Eur J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2012 May 19
PMID 22594914
Citations 104
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous functional magnetic resonance imaging studies in two rare patients, together with microneurography and psychophysical observations in healthy subjects, have demonstrated a system of mechanosensitive C-fiber tactile (CT) afferents sensitive to slowly moving stimuli. They project to the posterior insular cortex and signal pleasant aspects of touch. Importantly, CTs have not been found in the glabrous skin of the hand, yet it is commonly observed that glabrous skin touch is also perceived as pleasant. Here we asked if the brain processing of pleasant touch differs between hairy and glabrous skin by stroking the forearm and glabrous skin of the hand during positron emission tomography. The data showed that, when contrasting slow brush stroking on the forearm with slow brush stroking on the palm, there were significant activations of the posterior insular cortex and mid-anterior orbitofrontal cortex. The opposite contrast showed a significant activation of the somatosensory cortices. Although concurrent psychophysical ratings showed no differences in intensity or pleasantness ratings, a subsequent touch questionnaire in which subjects used a newly developed 'touch perception task' showed significant difference for the two body sites. Emotional descriptors received higher ratings on the forearm and sensory descriptors were rated more highly on the palm. The present findings are consistent with the hypothesis that pleasant touch from hairy skin, mediated by CT afferents, is processed in the limbic-related cortex and represents an innate non-learned process. In contrast, pleasant touch from glabrous skin, mediated by A-beta afferents, is processed in the somatosensory cortex and represents an analytical process dependent on previous tactile experiences.

Citing Articles

Social Touch: Its Mirror-like Responses and Implications in Neurological and Psychiatric Diseases.

Grandi L, Bruni S NeuroSci. 2024; 4(2):118-133.

PMID: 39483320 PMC: 11523712. DOI: 10.3390/neurosci4020012.


Touch medicine: bridging the gap between recent insights from touch research and clinical medicine and its special significance for the treatment of affective disorders.

McGlone F, Moberg K, Norholt H, Eggart M, Muller-Oerlinghausen B Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1390673.

PMID: 38881553 PMC: 11177324. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1390673.


Virtual social grooming in macaques and its psychophysiological effects.

Disarbois E, Duhamel J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):11697.

PMID: 38777816 PMC: 11111682. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62638-3.


Evolutionarily conserved neural responses to affective touch in monkeys transcend consciousness and change with age.

Charbonneau J, Santistevan A, Raven E, Bennett J, Russ B, Bliss-Moreau E Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(18):e2322157121.

PMID: 38648473 PMC: 11067024. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2322157121.


Human-Delivered Brushstroke Characterization using an Instrumented Brush Focused on Torque.

Landsman Z, Kao A, Gerling G World Haptics Conf. 2024; 2023:85-92.

PMID: 38618516 PMC: 11015477. DOI: 10.1109/whc56415.2023.10224489.