» Articles » PMID: 22592285

MR Volumetric Changes After Diagnostic CSF Removal in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Overview
Journal J Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2012 May 18
PMID 22592285
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although diagnostic CSF removal in patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is performed frequently, its impact on changes of the global brain volume and volume of the ventricles has not been studied in detail. We examined 20 patients with clinical and radiological signs of NPH. These received MRI prior to and immediately after diagnostic CSF removal, either via lumbar puncture (TAP, n = 10) or via external lumbar drainage (ELD, n = 10). Changes in global brain volume were assessed using SIENA, a tool from the FSL software library. Additionally, we determined the change of the lateral ventricles' volume by manual segmentation. Furthermore, we recorded systematic clinical assessments of the key features of NPH. The median volume of CSF removed was 35 ml in TAP patients and 406 ml in ELD patients. Changes in global brain volume were found in both patient groups. Brain volume change was significantly larger in ELD patients than in TAP patients (p = 0.022), and correlated with the volume of CSF removal (r = 0.628, p = 0.004). Brain volume expansion was most pronounced adjacent to the lateral ventricles, but also detectable in the temporal and frontal regions. The median ventricular volume decreased after CSF removal. Ventricular volume reduction was more pronounced in ELD patients than in TAP patients. This study quantifies for the first time immediate volumetric changes of global brain tissue and of ventricles after diagnostic CSF removal in NPH patients. In particular, we report evidence that CSF removal results in a change of the brain volume rather than only a change of the brain's shape.

Citing Articles

Quantitative gait analysis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus using deep learning algorithms on monocular videos.

Jeong S, Yu H, Park J, Kang K Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):12368.

PMID: 34117275 PMC: 8196211. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90524-9.


Normal pressure hydrocephalus: Diagnostic delay.

Saldarriaga-Cantillo A, Yepes-Gaviria V, Rivas J Biomedica. 2020; 40(4):656-663.

PMID: 33275344 PMC: 7808784. DOI: 10.7705/biomedica.5382.


iNPH with parkinsonism: response to lumbar CSF drainage and ventriculoperitoneal shunting.

Mostile G, Portaro G, Certo F, Luca A, Manna R, Terranova R J Neurol. 2020; 268(4):1254-1265.

PMID: 33078308 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-10267-x.


Automated Quantitation of Spinal CSF Volume and Measurement of Craniospinal CSF Redistribution following Lumbar Withdrawal in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Alperin N, Bagci A, Lee S, Lam B AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016; 37(10):1957-1963.

PMID: 27282859 PMC: 7960475. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4837.


Aqueductal Stroke Volume: Comparisons with Intracranial Pressure Scores in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Ringstad G, Emblem K, Geier O, Alperin N, Eide P AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015; 36(9):1623-30.

PMID: 25977480 PMC: 7968750. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4340.


References
1.
Jasperse B, Valsasina P, Neacsu V, Knol D, De Stefano N, Enzinger C . Intercenter agreement of brain atrophy measurement in multiple sclerosis patients using manually-edited SIENA and SIENAX. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 26(4):881-5. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21101. View

2.
Adams R, Fisher C, Hakim S, Ojemann R, SWEET W . SYMPTOMATIC OCCULT HYDROCEPHALUS WITH "NORMAL" CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID PRESSURE. A TREATABLE SYNDROME. N Engl J Med. 1965; 273:117-26. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM196507152730301. View

3.
Anderson R, Grant J, de la Paz R, Frucht S, Goodman R . Volumetric measurements in the detection of reduced ventricular volume in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus whose clinical condition improved after ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. J Neurosurg. 2002; 97(1):73-9. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2002.97.1.0073. View

4.
Mugler 3rd J, Brookeman J . Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE). Magn Reson Med. 1990; 15(1):152-7. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910150117. View

5.
Smith S . Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002; 17(3):143-55. PMC: 6871816. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.10062. View