» Articles » PMID: 22583463

Efficacy of Once-daily Indacaterol Relative to Alternative Bronchodilators in COPD: a Patient-level Mixed Treatment Comparison

Overview
Journal Value Health
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2012 May 16
PMID 22583463
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Indacaterol was evaluated versus placebo, formoterol, and salmeterol in randomized controlled trials. No direct comparisons, however, are available for indacaterol 150 μg with formoterol or indacaterol 300 μg with salmeterol. Indacaterol trial evidence was synthesized to provide coherent estimates of indacaterol 150 μg and indacaterol 300 μg relative to formoterol, salmeterol, and tiotropium.

Methods: Four randomized controlled trials were combined with Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons by using individual patient-level data. End points of interest were trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and response (≥ 4 points), and Transition Dyspnea Index total score and response (≥ 1 point).

Results: Indacaterol 150 μg demonstrated a higher FEV(1) than did formoterol at 12 weeks and 6 months (0.10 L difference; 95% credible interval [CrI] = 0.06-0.14), as did indacaterol 300 μg versus salmeterol (0.06 L difference at 12 weeks; CrI = 0.02-0.10; 0.06 L at 6 months; CrI = 0.02-0.11). Regarding SGRQ, indacaterol 150 μg demonstrated a comparable proportion of responders versus formoterol, as did indacaterol 300 μg versus salmeterol. In comparison to tiotropium, indacaterol 150 μg demonstrated a greater proportion of responders (odds ratio = 1.52 at 12 weeks; CrI 1.15-2.00). For Transition Dyspnea Index, indacaterol 150 μg and formoterol showed a similar response. Indacaterol 300 μg was more efficacious than salmeterol (odds ratio = 1.65 at 12 weeks; CrI 1.16-2.34). Overall, indacaterol 150 μg showed the greatest efficacy for SGRQ and indacaterol 300 μg for FEV(1) and Transition Dyspnea Index.

Conclusion: Indacaterol is expected to be comparable to formoterol, salmeterol, and tiotropium, providing higher FEV(1) than formoterol and salmeterol and greater improvement in the SGRQ total score than tiotropium. Indacaterol 150 μg provided comparable improvement in dyspnea, while indacaterol 300 μg demonstrated the greatest response overall.

Citing Articles

Critical Appraisal of Published Indirect Comparisons and Network Meta-Analyses of Competing Interventions for Multiple Myeloma.

Cope S, Toor K, Popoff E, Fonseca R, Landgren O, Mateos M Value Health. 2020; 23(4):441-450.

PMID: 32327161 PMC: 7480667. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.11.003.


Comparative efficacy of long-acting β2-agonists as monotherapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a network meta-analysis.

Donohue J, Betts K, Du E, Altman P, Goyal P, Keininger D Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017; 12:367-381.

PMID: 28176892 PMC: 5261557. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S119908.


A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data.

Veroniki A, Straus S, Soobiah C, Elliott M, Tricco A BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016; 16:47.

PMID: 27116943 PMC: 4847203. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-016-0146-y.


Once-daily long-acting beta-agonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an indirect comparison of olodaterol and indacaterol.

Roskell N, Anzueto A, Hamilton A, Disse B, Becker K Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014; 9:813-24.

PMID: 25114521 PMC: 4124050. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S59673.


A process for assessing the feasibility of a network meta-analysis: a case study of everolimus in combination with hormonal therapy versus chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer.

Cope S, Zhang J, Saletan S, Smiechowski B, Jansen J, Schmid P BMC Med. 2014; 12:93.

PMID: 24898705 PMC: 4077675. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-93.